Let a household choose to be paid for the red days

Asking for a full week off never spent anything on the Saturday, the Sunday or a holiday, and a test now says so outright rather than leaving it to be rediscovered. Those days are free because vacation cannot be taken on a day that is not a working day. Parental benefit is a payment rather than a schedule, though, so it can be drawn on a red day to turn an unpaid day off into a paid one — at the cost of a day the family would otherwise keep. That is now a workspace setting, off by default, and it never reaches for a vacation day. With it off the planner behaves exactly as before. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ei7gCZzdd751uZtPzb1Pep
2026-09-19 14:28:38 +02:00
parent 1837154225
commit b87ad0e7ad
18 changed files with 511 additions and 10 deletions
@@ -647,6 +647,71 @@ describe('Settings', () => {
    expect(setShowWeekNumbers).toHaveBeenCalledWith(true)
  })

+  describe('take PL on red days', () => {
+    it('renders unchecked by default', () => {
+      renderSettings()
+      expect(screen.getByTestId('take-pl-on-red-days-checkbox')).not.toBeChecked()
+    })
+
+    it('renders checked when the workspace has it enabled', () => {
+      vi.mocked(useWorkspace).mockReturnValue(
+        makeWorkspaceContextValue({
+          workspace: {
+            id: 'ws-1',
+            name: 'Test Workspace',
+            createdAt: '2026-01-01',
+            takePlOnRedDays: true,
+          },
+          workspaceId: 'ws-1',
+          children: [{ id: 'c-1', name: 'Child 1', birth_date: CHILD_BIRTH_DATE }],
+          selectedChildId: 'c-1',
+          personalDataUuid: 'pd-1',
+          parentName: 'Test Parent',
+        })
+      )
+      renderSettings()
+      expect(screen.getByTestId('take-pl-on-red-days-checkbox')).toBeChecked()
+    })
+
+    it('saves the setting and refreshes the workspace context on toggle', async () => {
+      vi.mocked(api.updateWorkspace).mockResolvedValue({
+        id: 'ws-1',
+        name: 'Test Workspace',
+        createdAt: '2026-01-01',
+        takePlOnRedDays: true,
+      })
+      const mockRefreshContext = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined)
+      vi.mocked(useWorkspace).mockReturnValue(
+        makeWorkspaceContextValue({
+          workspace: { id: 'ws-1', name: 'Test Workspace', createdAt: '2026-01-01' },
+          workspaceId: 'ws-1',
+          children: [{ id: 'c-1', name: 'Child 1', birth_date: CHILD_BIRTH_DATE }],
+          selectedChildId: 'c-1',
+          personalDataUuid: 'pd-1',
+          parentName: 'Test Parent',
+          refreshContext: mockRefreshContext,
+        })
+      )
+      renderSettings()
+
+      fireEvent.click(screen.getByTestId('take-pl-on-red-days-checkbox'))
+
+      await waitFor(() =>
+        expect(api.updateWorkspace).toHaveBeenCalledWith('ws-1', { takePlOnRedDays: true })
+      )
+      expect(mockRefreshContext).toHaveBeenCalled()
+    })
+
+    it('shows an error message when saving fails', async () => {
+      vi.mocked(api.updateWorkspace).mockRejectedValue(new Error('network down'))
+      renderSettings()
+
+      fireEvent.click(screen.getByTestId('take-pl-on-red-days-checkbox'))
+
+      expect(await screen.findByTestId('save-message')).toHaveTextContent('network down')
+    })
+  })
+
  describe('language selector', () => {
    // Node's own experimental `localStorage` global shadows jsdom's working
    // implementation in this environment and throws on every call — stub a