The calendar mixed two kinds of truth in one table. `planned_leave_day` was
simultaneously the allocator's output cache, the user's override store
(`is_pinned`, plus ad-hoc rows with no `wish_id`), and the resource ledger that
analytics and the age-4 maths read. The planner therefore had to ask "am I
allowed to touch this row?" on every sync, and got it wrong at the edges.
Every user assertion is now one `day_assertion` row — a concrete `day_type`
replaces a pinned day, a row with no `wish_id` replaces an ad-hoc day, and
`day_type='none'` replaces `planned_day_exclusion`. `planned_leave_day` becomes
purely derived with a single writer, and `PlanningService.pinned_keys()` is the
single answer to "is this day pinned", used by the allocator's loader, by
`sync_plan` and by the read router alike.
On top of that, every calendar band is now a real event: an ad-hoc band opens
the same full editor as a wish-backed one and saving it promotes it to a
`LeaveWish`, so it can be named, repeated yearly, assigned to either or both
parents, and handed to the planner. "Planering" is a `moveable` toggle plus a
from/to month bound plus a separate lock/unlock action on the days themselves,
replacing a three-rung ladder whose "planner decides" rung set a search window
equal to the drawn dates and so could never move anything.
Bugs found and fixed along the way:
- The plan erased its own history. Fixed windows clip to today, so an elapsed
auto-placed day fell into `stale_keys` and was deleted on the next sync —
and a background sync runs on every workspace load. Past rows are now frozen
and counted as spent.
- Migration 010's downgrade silently destroyed every pinned day and exclusion
(`is_pinned` returned as DEFAULT 0, the exclusion table came back empty,
exit 0, no warning). It now reconstructs both from `day_assertion`, and 009
itemises what it cannot recover before dropping the table.
- Deleting a period left its assertions behind, locking those dates forever
with no UI path to clear them. Wish deletion now clears them by `wish_id`.
- `DayAssertionService` and `LeaveWishService` committed multi-statement writes
without a transaction; a crash mid-write diverged the tables or half-deleted
a series. Both now run in a unit of work.
- A sibling year's shortfall was never surfaced: the toast only inspected the
edited occurrence's outcome, so a fully unfunded later year rendered as an
empty band with no warning.
- A flexible window whose bound had entirely elapsed was dropped from the
proposal with no outcome at all. It now reports as `unplaced`.
- Unlocking a period deleted its days instead of returning them to the planner.
- The e2e global setup posted to a route deleted in this change, which would
have failed the whole suite before its first test.
Gates: backend 938 tests / 91% coverage, frontend 1351 / 97.4 | 92.2 | 94.37 |
97.4. Migrations 009 and 010 audited against a hand-built realistic database:
the upgrade reconciles exactly and a constraint violation fails safe, leaving
the schema at 008.
Not complete. Step 4's toggle, month picker and lock/unlock action are verified
by browser walk and unit tests, but the partial-lock readout was not exercised.
`ideas.md` §7 adds a full plan for the vacation-forfeiture defect (the planner
detects expiring days and then does nothing about them) — not implemented here.
Remaining smaller items are listed in the session's restructure notes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T4wjgbVL4HAC5Rdaw75VbV
Three changes that together unblock treating a calendar period as one
editable object.
Migration 008 adds `planned_leave_day.wish_id` (nullable, ON DELETE SET NULL)
so a persisted day knows which `leave_wish` produced it, `is_pinned` to mark a
day the user hand-edited, and `leave_wish.target_days` so a period drawn on a
calendar need not be a whole number of weeks. Apply-time identity still keys on
day_type/is_dubbeldag only, so a wish_id-only difference is a metadata update
rather than a collision.
The age-4 savable ceiling was applying the per-child figure of 96 to each
parent's pool, modelling a two-parent family as able to save 192 days past the
child's fourth birthday. `resolve_age4_savable_cap` is now the single place
that decides 48 (couple with two parents) versus 96 (everyone else), and both
AnalyticsService and the allocator read it.
Migration 009 drops `workspace.planning_goal` and `leave_wish.goal_override`.
The allocator's tier-3 policy collapses to one rule; `salary_type` still
branches, since that reflects what a vacation day actually costs a parent
rather than a user preference.
jacobh2