Clicking the month or year label only ever stepped forward
(`month + 1`, `year + 1`), so the only way back was the prev-month arrow,
one month at a time. Jumping back a year was impossible.
Both labels are now selects, so any month or year is one click away in
either direction. Selects rather than +/- steppers because the app
already uses them elsewhere, and because stepping in a second direction
would still not give the "quickly jump" part of the original intent.
Year options are bounded to 2026-2055, the calendar cache range: outside
it the backend raises UncachedYearError and returns 422, so offering
those years would hand the user an error instead of a calendar.
The prev/next month arrows are unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RXMhc9nT6sNz1SL4j8dznL
Plan.tsx's handlers swallowed their rejections and onUpdate was typed to
return void, so WishEditor could not observe a failed save. It inferred
the outcome instead -- comparing the draft it sent against the next
wishes prop, and reading "isSaving went false without a match" as
failure. That coupled save status to refetch timing and could not tell a
network error from a slow refresh.
The handlers now return their promise, onUpdate accepts
`void | Promise<void>` so void-returning callers still typecheck, and
WishEditor awaits and catches the real outcome. The inference machinery
(sentDraftRef, prevIsSavingRef and the comparison effect) is removed
rather than left alongside, since two sources of truth can disagree.
The save/refetch/save loop guard is untouched: it lives in the draft
reseed effect, which only fills a row that has no draft yet, and saves
only ever originate from an explicit onChange. Added a comment saying so.
A failed row now keeps its edit and offers an explicit retry, rather than
requiring another edit to retrigger the debounce. Per-row failures report
inline only -- reporting them in the page banner too would double-report
the same error.
Also removes wishEditor.saveButton/savingButton, dead since the per-row
Save button was replaced by auto-save.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RXMhc9nT6sNz1SL4j8dznL
Both screens showed an "expiring at age 4" number under near-identical
labels, and they disagreed -- 143 on the Dashboard versus 100 on the Plan
tab for the same parent. Both were correct: the Dashboard reflects the
saved plan, the Plan tab a proposal that has not been applied and which
simulates future recurring wishes.
The numbers are left untouched; forcing them to agree would make one of
them wrong. Instead each label now states its own basis ("om nuvarande
plan följs" / "om detta förslag tillämpas"), and the Plan tab's intro
says outright that the saved plan may differ, and why.
Tests assert the distinguishing copy on both screens so the two cannot
silently drift back to indistinguishable labels.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RXMhc9nT6sNz1SL4j8dznL
sv.ts/en.ts were single 602-line files that every feature had to edit,
making concurrent work on unrelated screens collide constantly. Split
both into per-domain modules (common, auth, calendar, dashboard,
settings, plan, wishEditor, tips) composed by an index that preserves
the existing `import { sv } from './sv'` specifier, so no consumer
changes.
Typing still catches drift in both directions: each en module is checked
against TranslationKey, and the composed catalogue must satisfy
Record<TranslationKey, string>.
All 433 keys and their values are byte-identical to the originals,
verified by diffing the parsed catalogues against the pre-split files.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RXMhc9nT6sNz1SL4j8dznL
jacobh2