Three changes to calendar editing, too interleaved in the same files to
land separately.
Giving the same days to the second parent rewrote the first parent's
days instead of adding their own. The save looked the existing day up
against whoever was logged in rather than the parent being saved for, so
parent A's leave turned into parent B's vacation. The parent choice now
lives with the lookup, and two parents on the same dates produce two
rows and two bands.
Drawing a period by hand meant naming a day type up front. It now asks
who is off and lets the planner fund it, as a one-off period the sync
places, with double days offered when both parents are off and priced
honestly in the hint. Pinning an exact day type is still there, moved
behind Advanced, and editing a pinned day goes straight back to it.
Removing a period offered only the two extremes. There are now three
choices: this day, this year's period, or every year. Taking one year
out of a repeating period narrows it, or splits it in two when the year
is in the middle; where a scope cannot be expressed it is disabled with
a reason rather than doing something surprising.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ei7gCZzdd751uZtPzb1Pep
A calendar whose boxes resize is not a calendar. Each week row is its own
grid, and a bare 1fr track takes its minimum from its content, so the one
week containing "Alla helgons dag" had its seven cells squeezed while
every other week's stayed wide. The tracks are now minmax(0, 1fr) and the
cell, the day and the holiday name each refuse to contribute an intrinsic
width; the name clips to an ellipsis and keeps its full text in the title.
Row height follows the same rule: the band lanes are reserved from the
month's tallest week rather than each row's own, so a week with no leave
in it stands as tall as the week beside it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ei7gCZzdd751uZtPzb1Pep
Onboarding asks explicitly for one or two parents and shows one card per
parent for balances; the balance form is per parent with inline
validation; the partner can be filled from the FK deduction or added
from it. Settings and Dashboard reuse the same form.
CSS: bare buttons carry no colour any more; buttons, cards, choice
cards, fields, alerts, badges, eyebrow and modal chrome are defined once
in primitives.css. Media queries live only in responsive.css. A style
guard test blocks hex, !important and stray media queries. Bilingual
fixes: calendar selects size by content, header no longer wraps. Vitest
is capped at four workers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The red-day checks asserted literal colour values copied out of the calendar
stylesheet, so any restyle broke them whether or not it broke the behaviour
they exist to protect. They now resolve the same custom properties the page
uses, and check that a Sunday and a Saturday are styled differently rather
than that they are two particular shades.
The browser suite checked what the app renders but nothing about authoring,
which is the part that changed. It now registers a fresh account and walks
the wizard, including the case where a partner added mid-wizard has to appear
by name without navigating away first, and it drags a range on the calendar,
deletes the period, and reloads to confirm the days really went. Both are
regressions that were found by hand within the last day and would have been
found here instead.
Doing this surfaced that the age-four spec had been asserting on figures that
moved inside a collapsed section, so it had stopped checking anything. The
stale note about the retired tips page went too.
Every serious defect in this project was found by opening the app, most
recently a feature that rendered blank cards to every user while its tests
passed, and a progress bar labelled in the wrong unit. Five checks now run
without a person: that the age-four figures on screen match what the API
computed, that a multi-week period draws as one bar rather than fragments,
that Sundays and holidays are red where Saturdays are not, that no identifier
leaks into visible text, and that no page logs an error.
Three of them were confirmed by reintroducing the original bug and watching
the right test fail. Dates are derived rather than written down: Easter is
computed independently instead of asked of the system under test, and the
fixture period is placed relative to today, so the suite does not expire.
It runs as its own job and does not block a merge until it has proved itself
stable.
jacobh2