The calendar mixed two kinds of truth in one table. `planned_leave_day` was
simultaneously the allocator's output cache, the user's override store
(`is_pinned`, plus ad-hoc rows with no `wish_id`), and the resource ledger that
analytics and the age-4 maths read. The planner therefore had to ask "am I
allowed to touch this row?" on every sync, and got it wrong at the edges.
Every user assertion is now one `day_assertion` row — a concrete `day_type`
replaces a pinned day, a row with no `wish_id` replaces an ad-hoc day, and
`day_type='none'` replaces `planned_day_exclusion`. `planned_leave_day` becomes
purely derived with a single writer, and `PlanningService.pinned_keys()` is the
single answer to "is this day pinned", used by the allocator's loader, by
`sync_plan` and by the read router alike.
On top of that, every calendar band is now a real event: an ad-hoc band opens
the same full editor as a wish-backed one and saving it promotes it to a
`LeaveWish`, so it can be named, repeated yearly, assigned to either or both
parents, and handed to the planner. "Planering" is a `moveable` toggle plus a
from/to month bound plus a separate lock/unlock action on the days themselves,
replacing a three-rung ladder whose "planner decides" rung set a search window
equal to the drawn dates and so could never move anything.
Bugs found and fixed along the way:
- The plan erased its own history. Fixed windows clip to today, so an elapsed
auto-placed day fell into `stale_keys` and was deleted on the next sync —
and a background sync runs on every workspace load. Past rows are now frozen
and counted as spent.
- Migration 010's downgrade silently destroyed every pinned day and exclusion
(`is_pinned` returned as DEFAULT 0, the exclusion table came back empty,
exit 0, no warning). It now reconstructs both from `day_assertion`, and 009
itemises what it cannot recover before dropping the table.
- Deleting a period left its assertions behind, locking those dates forever
with no UI path to clear them. Wish deletion now clears them by `wish_id`.
- `DayAssertionService` and `LeaveWishService` committed multi-statement writes
without a transaction; a crash mid-write diverged the tables or half-deleted
a series. Both now run in a unit of work.
- A sibling year's shortfall was never surfaced: the toast only inspected the
edited occurrence's outcome, so a fully unfunded later year rendered as an
empty band with no warning.
- A flexible window whose bound had entirely elapsed was dropped from the
proposal with no outcome at all. It now reports as `unplaced`.
- Unlocking a period deleted its days instead of returning them to the planner.
- The e2e global setup posted to a route deleted in this change, which would
have failed the whole suite before its first test.
Gates: backend 938 tests / 91% coverage, frontend 1351 / 97.4 | 92.2 | 94.37 |
97.4. Migrations 009 and 010 audited against a hand-built realistic database:
the upgrade reconciles exactly and a constraint violation fails safe, leaving
the schema at 008.
Not complete. Step 4's toggle, month picker and lock/unlock action are verified
by browser walk and unit tests, but the partial-lock readout was not exercised.
`ideas.md` §7 adds a full plan for the vacation-forfeiture defect (the planner
detects expiring days and then does nothing about them) — not implemented here.
Remaining smaller items are listed in the session's restructure notes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T4wjgbVL4HAC5Rdaw75VbV
Warnings such as "vacation days at risk of being lost" kept showing after
the planner had already resolved them. The planner itself was firing
correctly -- PlanSyncProvider syncs on every plan-input change -- so the
fault was in the warnings, in two independent places.
The vacation-expiry warning was computed before allocation. It read
`vacation_forfeiting`, which the loader derives from already-committed
usage, while `_assign_tier3` deliberately spends at-risk vacation days
first precisely to avoid that forfeiture. The figure therefore counted
days the plan was in the middle of saving. `_vacation_expiry_warnings`
now subtracts the vacation days this run actually placed for that parent
and year, clamped at zero -- sound because the bank is FIFO, so a day
spent in year Y retires one expiring day one-for-one. The full
carry-forward simulation is still not duplicated inside the ledger.
The Dashboard then never refreshed them. Its proposal came from a
one-shot effect guarded by `proposal === null`, with no planVersion
dependency, so the card kept rendering the pre-replan warning until
remount -- while `syncPlan` was already returning a fresh proposal that
both call sites discarded. PlanSyncProvider now exposes that proposal
behind a monotonic counter, and usePlanProposal prefers it once any sync
has completed, keeping `propose()` for the first load.
Also adds a manual recompute button to Settings, which only bumps
planVersion and reports what the resulting sync did, and fixes partner
add/remove never bumping planVersion at all -- that gap meant gaining or
losing a parent never re-ran the allocator, though it changes who days
can be assigned to. Rename stays cosmetic.
Verified in the browser: a 2031 warning of 15 days dropped to 12 after
three vacation days were planned, without a reload.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014jPFUcCJ5AKXmPVC1anhXe
Free days (Sat/Sun/red days, subject to DayOverride) can never be
vacation, and can only be parental leave when the workspace opts in via
take_pl_on_red_days. The allocator already honoured this; the hand-pin
path bypassed it entirely.
- PlanningService gains optional workspace_repo/day_override_repo deps
and _reject_illegal_free_day, enforced in add_planned_day and update.
Reuses allocation_service.is_free_day rather than re-deriving it, and
no-ops when the deps are unset so existing callers are unaffected.
- update_planned_day had no ValidationError handler at all, so a
validation failure there 500'd instead of 422'ing. Fixed.
- Calendar filters the pin write loop by the day's isFree; the modal
explains free days stay off, and that pinning opts a day out of
automatic re-planning.
Vacation days at risk of forfeiture were computed and sent over the
wire but never rendered: an at-risk column with the age-out/over-cap
split, and a dashboard key figure.
PlanProposal.warnings was likewise parsed but rendered nowhere, for all
three kinds. Adds PlanWarningCard in a Risks section above the tips,
with parent names resolved and dates formatted.
POST /api/plan/sync now fires from the workspace layer on every
plan-input change rather than only from Calendar, so a Settings edit or
a pinned-day save re-plans day types instead of merely refetching.
Overlapping bumps coalesce into one trailing run; a rejection cannot
wedge the in-flight guard. eviction_preview was silently dropped by the
frontend despite always being on the wire, and is now surfaced through
context.
Verified: backend 890 passed (91.49% coverage), frontend 1297 passed,
ruff/eslint/tsc clean. Browser-checked in Swedish and English.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JVQx4NUvPbJhn6UcvRd2QY
A yearly-repeating period kept the same calendar date instead of the same
weekday: 2026-10-05..10-11 (Mon-Sun) recurred as 2027-10-05..10-11 (Tue-Mon)
rather than 2027-10-04..10-10. The snap added in 224fe7a only ever covered
window_mode == 'fixed'; 'flexible' wishes were unaligned at both stages.
project_window now snaps both modes. A flexible bound is still a bounding
range, but it keeps its weekday alignment year over year with its span held
fixed, so the search space never shrinks and a bound that is exactly as long
as the target (its only candidate) repeats week-shaped.
_rank_candidate gains a Monday-start term between cost and start, so equal-cost
candidates break on week alignment instead of "earliest". It sits after cost
deliberately: a cheaper non-Monday start still wins, because red days outrank
alignment.
_reuse_already_funded_window would otherwise freeze a pre-existing misaligned
placement forever, so it now releases a year whose reuse winner is misaligned
when a fresh search ranks strictly better -- never when one of its days is
pinned or excluded, so a deliberate per-day override always survives.
Migration 008 realigns flexible series already materialised under the old rule;
projection runs once, at create/update, so nothing repairs them on read.
Alongside this, the planner now says when it moved a period to catch red days.
WindowOutcome carries shift_gain_days (the saving over the naive bound-start
placement) and the calendar toasts it, once, on the sync that decided it.
A fixed window is never auto-moved -- its "exact requested placement,
unconditionally" guarantee stands -- but its shift suggestion is no longer
hidden behind a shortfall, so a fully-funded one can surface a cheaper week too.
Editing a period in the popover now also sends window_mode: 'fixed' with a
matching target. Preset chips create flexible wishes; dragging one down to an
exact week left it flexible with a week-long bound, which is the degenerate
single-candidate case that produced the reported dates.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DXPBfr1v7F71t6QcbHCaaT
Three strands of work that grew together across the same settings screen and
API client, so they land as one change.
Per-year preschool planning days ("studiedagar"): new table, repository
(SQLite + Postgres), service, router and migration 007, plus the hooks and
Settings UI to plan and record them per child and year. Allocation now
reserves the recorded figure for a year where one exists and only falls back
to the child-level estimate otherwise, marking that fallback as assumed.
Partner invitations: workspaces issue and list invitations, registration
accepts an invite token to join the inviter's workspace instead of creating a
personal one, and a /join/:token page plus the settings invite panel drive it.
Vacation forfeiture: tips and the dashboard now distinguish days a parent
genuinely loses from days that merely age, so the warning stops firing on
balances that were never at risk.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The scraper never read "överlåtbara dagar" from Försäkringskassan. It only
visited ansok-och-planera-foraldrapenning#/valjdagar and derived the
reserved/transferable split in build_snapshot, assuming transferable days
are spent before reserved ones. On real data that gave 49 for the user and
0 for the partner where FK states 129 and 71.
The assumption cannot be repaired: reserved-first, transferable-first,
proportional and cap-based models were all checked against real figures and
none reproduces FK's accounting (reserved-first fits the partner but is 10
days off for the user). FK publishes the real numbers per parent per tier on
the min-foraldrapenning page, which the scraper had never visited.
- Scrape the "Dagar ni kan föra över" panel after the valjdagar extraction,
summing sjukpenningnivå + lägstanivå per parent. The totals are not
literals on the page. Parse only direct-child <p> elements: the first
group embeds a tooltip with decoy "45 dagar"/"90 dagar" text.
- build_snapshot accepts the reported value and derives reserved days from
it; the old arithmetic remains only as a fallback. An implausible FK value
degrades to that fallback rather than failing the fetch.
- Record provenance in transferable_days_reported (migration 006) and badge
derived values as estimates in the dashboard breakdown. Drop the footnote's
claim that at most 150 days are transferable — real data contradicts it as
a per-family figure.
- Select the child's section by name when FK lists several; never guess.
Verified against a live BankID scrape: scraped 240/101/139 with 129
transferable, deduced partner 240/169/71 with 71, both flagged as reported.
Incidental fixes found along the way:
- The fetch router never forwarded the partner's transferable figure to
persist_partner_deduction, so the partner's stored snapshot would have kept
the flawed split even once the parse landed.
- 'deduced' snapshots were labelled "Manually entered" by a two-way ternary
over a three-value union. Replaced with a compiler-checked exhaustive map.
- Alembic resolved its database from alembic.ini alone, ignoring
APP_SQLITE_PATH, so migrations silently targeted the developer's real
database even when pointed elsewhere. env.py now resolves it, preferring
-x sqlalchemy.url, then a real APP_SQLITE_PATH, then the ini value.
- backend/captures/ was not ignored: the root pattern was anchored as
/captures/ despite a comment saying scraper dumps must never be tracked.
- CLAUDE.md quoted test counts and coverage percentages that had gone stale,
which made a correct verification report look suspect. Gate thresholds kept.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DXPBfr1v7F71t6QcbHCaaT
Each parent projection now carries one entry per calendar year from
birth to the fourth birthday: vacation earned, carried in, planned,
left, carried out and expiring under Semesterlagen's 20-day floor and
5-year carry-over, plus parental-leave days used and left at year end
with the age-4 clamp applied in the birthday year. The overview sums
them into per-year totals. Frontend types, mapper and fixtures follow.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XBRLomdLK9jF7wU7a8AA6H
Taking one day out of a period the planner placed did nothing that
lasted: the period still asked for a full week, so the next sync put the
day straight back. The option was disabled rather than lying about it.
A removed day is now recorded as its own thing — no leave for this
parent, this child, this date — and the planner honours it on every
later sync. It is kept apart from the working-day overrides, which
answer a different question about the calendar rather than about the
plan.
The day belongs to the parent whose band was clicked, so removing one
parent's day leaves their partner's alone; where both parents were to be
off on one funding arrangement, the partner is simply funded on their
own instead. A removed day shortens what the period is asking for rather
than counting as a day the plan failed to find, so the advice about
closing a shortfall does not start arguing for a day nobody wants.
Nothing is removed without a way back: the toast undoes it, and the day
itself is marked in the calendar and offers to restore.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ei7gCZzdd751uZtPzb1Pep
A repeating period was a single row that the planner expanded into one
window per year at read time, so no year had anywhere to differ from the
others. Editing one year rewrote them all, and removing a year in the
middle had to split the wish in two. Neither survives contact with the
thing this app is for: Easter moves, and the cheapest week is not the
same week every year.
Each year is now its own row, linked by a series id. Editing one year
touches one row; editing the series re-projects the rest from it.
Removing a year is one delete. The weekday snap is worked out once, when
the rows are made, and stored, so a row now says what it means rather
than being re-derived on every read. Recurrence stops being a stored
field and becomes what it always was in practice — an instruction at
create and update time; whether a period repeats is whether it belongs
to a series.
Migration 004 rebuilds the table and expands the existing rows, keeping
each original row as its first year so the days already planned against
it still point somewhere. A Feb 29 anchor recurring into a common year
used to raise out of the allocator; it clamps now.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ei7gCZzdd751uZtPzb1Pep
Three changes to calendar editing, too interleaved in the same files to
land separately.
Giving the same days to the second parent rewrote the first parent's
days instead of adding their own. The save looked the existing day up
against whoever was logged in rather than the parent being saved for, so
parent A's leave turned into parent B's vacation. The parent choice now
lives with the lookup, and two parents on the same dates produce two
rows and two bands.
Drawing a period by hand meant naming a day type up front. It now asks
who is off and lets the planner fund it, as a one-off period the sync
places, with double days offered when both parents are off and priced
honestly in the hint. Pinning an exact day type is still there, moved
behind Advanced, and editing a pinned day goes straight back to it.
Removing a period offered only the two extremes. There are now three
choices: this day, this year's period, or every year. Taking one year
out of a repeating period narrows it, or splits it in two when the year
is in the middle; where a scope cannot be expressed it is disabled with
a reason rather than doing something surprising.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ei7gCZzdd751uZtPzb1Pep
Asking for a full week off never spent anything on the Saturday, the
Sunday or a holiday, and a test now says so outright rather than leaving
it to be rediscovered. Those days are free because vacation cannot be
taken on a day that is not a working day.
Parental benefit is a payment rather than a schedule, though, so it can
be drawn on a red day to turn an unpaid day off into a paid one — at the
cost of a day the family would otherwise keep. That is now a workspace
setting, off by default, and it never reaches for a vacation day. With it
off the planner behaves exactly as before.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ei7gCZzdd751uZtPzb1Pep
Onboarding asks explicitly for one or two parents and shows one card per
parent for balances; the balance form is per parent with inline
validation; the partner can be filled from the FK deduction or added
from it. Settings and Dashboard reuse the same form.
CSS: bare buttons carry no colour any more; buttons, cards, choice
cards, fields, alerts, badges, eyebrow and modal chrome are defined once
in primitives.css. Media queries live only in responsive.css. A style
guard test blocks hex, !important and stray media queries. Bilingual
fixes: calendar selects size by content, header no longer wraps. Vitest
is capped at four workers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two components each carried the same four lines turning a date into an ISO
string from local parts. They now share one helper, deliberately separate
from the one that formats in UTC: substituting one for the other shifts the
day by one anywhere east of Greenwich, Sweden included, so a test pins the
difference rather than a comment asking nicely.
Creating a period ran its own copy of the sync-and-report sequence purely so
it could name a wish the lookup could not yet see; it now passes that wish to
the ordinary path instead.
Two comments still explained their relationship to components deleted some
time ago, which would send the next reader looking for files that are not
there, and some styling outlived the markup it described.
Applying a plan by itself stopped being something the interface does once
every edit began recomputing and saving in one call. The hook that posted
straight to the apply endpoint had no caller left, nor did its request type
or its fixture.
The response decoder stays, since the sync response embeds the same object,
and the two tests being deleted were the only ones checking how its collision
and rejection fields are renamed — that coverage moved onto the sync test
rather than leaving with the code it happened to live next to.
Three faults, all invisible while the tests passed. Advice was built for the
first child only, so a second child got none. The planned days feeding every
count were fetched once per parent and appended to one list, so a couple's
days were counted twice and every intensity and projection derived from them
was wrong. And dismissing a tip forgot the moment the page reloaded.
Tips now carry the date they concern, lifted from figures the rules already
computed, so a view of a month can show only what applies to it. They are
built per child and identified per child, so the same rule firing for two
children is two separate pieces of advice.
A dismissal is stored against a fingerprint of the facts that were dismissed.
When those facts change the advice returns with its new numbers, rather than
one click silencing a warning about a forfeiture that keeps growing.
Registering used to land you on a bare form asking for a child, with no hint
what came next. A short wizard now walks through the child, whether you are
planning alone or together, and where the day balances come from: fetched from
Försäkringskassan, entered by hand, or skipped — and if skipped, the figures
carry a badge saying they are estimates until real ones arrive.
Fetching is the first option rather than a hidden one, so the scraper is on by
default and the script that used to force it on no longer needs to.
Planning and Tips lose their tabs. Authoring moved to the calendar and the
figures moved to the overview, so both pages were only a second way to reach
what is already on screen; their routes now redirect rather than dead-end. The
dead translations went with them.
Dates also follow the chosen language now instead of always formatting as
Swedish.
The page opened with generic tiles and a bar reading forty-eight of ninety-six
weeks, which was neither weeks nor connected to the age-four ceiling it appeared
to describe. It is replaced by one headline and a bar per parent, in days,
against each parent's own savable limit as the server reports it.
The headline has two framings on the same arithmetic. Before anything is
planned it says what there is to plan and what will be lost without a plan,
because on the first day almost the whole entitlement is technically at risk
and saying so bluntly reads as an accusation. Once a plan exists it warns about
the days genuinely at stake.
A timeline of the years to the fourth birthday answers what the next four years
look like, which a month-at-a-time calendar cannot. Shortfalls, surplus advice
and balances sit below the fold, read-only: applying is automatic now, so a
second apply button would be a way to get two different answers.
Rejection messages move to one shared place that resolves a parent's name, so
an identifier can no longer surface in their place.
A six-week summer used to render as a row of disconnected bars, because bars
were derived per week row and grouped by parent and day type. They carried no
identity and ignored pointer events, so there was nothing to click. Bands now
group by the wish that produced them, bridge the weekends and red days inside
a period, and round only the ends that are genuinely the first and last day.
Each day still shows what pays for it, and a hand-edited day is marked as one
the planner will leave alone.
Sundays and public holidays now render red and Saturdays a neutral grey,
following the printed almanacka people compare against, and a holiday's name
is visible in the cell rather than hidden in a tooltip. This also explains the
report that months looked unshaded: weekends had no styling at all, since the
day component handled only red days and klämdagar.
The year selector follows the range the calendar API actually serves instead
of a hardcoded span.
Three changes that together unblock treating a calendar period as one
editable object.
Migration 008 adds `planned_leave_day.wish_id` (nullable, ON DELETE SET NULL)
so a persisted day knows which `leave_wish` produced it, `is_pinned` to mark a
day the user hand-edited, and `leave_wish.target_days` so a period drawn on a
calendar need not be a whole number of weeks. Apply-time identity still keys on
day_type/is_dubbeldag only, so a wish_id-only difference is a metadata update
rather than a collision.
The age-4 savable ceiling was applying the per-child figure of 96 to each
parent's pool, modelling a two-parent family as able to save 192 days past the
child's fourth birthday. `resolve_age4_savable_cap` is now the single place
that decides 48 (couple with two parents) versus 96 (everyone else), and both
AnalyticsService and the allocator read it.
Migration 009 drops `workspace.planning_goal` and `leave_wish.goal_override`.
The allocator's tier-3 policy collapses to one rule; `salary_type` still
branches, since that reflects what a vacation day actually costs a parent
rather than a user preference.
A frozen shared constant forces a test needing one different field to
either mutate shared state, leaking into every other test, or spread it
by hand. The make*(overrides) factories cover both cases and were already
doing the same job, so the constants were redundant.
MOCK_PARENT_A and MOCK_PARENT_B were distinct identities that partner
tests tell apart, so their uuid and name are now passed explicitly at
each call site rather than left to a factory default -- the values those
tests depend on stay visible where they are used.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RXMhc9nT6sNz1SL4j8dznL
ESLint turned `no-explicit-any` off for test files, and 219 casts had
accumulated across 12 of them. Two shapes, very different risks: most
were `(useWorkspace as any).mockReturnValue(...)`, mere laziness that
`vi.mocked()` does properly; the rest cast partial fixtures onto API
types, which erases the contract exactly where a test should enforce it.
That second kind matters here specifically. This project's recurring bug
is a field silently dropped between backend and frontend -- the
hand-written mapping in models/plan.py has done it twice, and apiFetch
mishandling structured errors was the same shape. A test that casts an
incomplete fixture to `any` keeps passing through precisely that change.
A typed fixture layer already existed at tests/fixtures/mockData.ts and
was imported by exactly zero tests: the right tool was there and
invisible, so everyone reached for a cast. It is now a set of
`make*(overrides: Partial<T>) => T` factories returning complete, valid
objects, split by domain with a barrel. When a type gains a field, one
factory fails to compile instead of thirty tests silently passing.
With the count at zero the ESLint exemption is deleted, so this cannot
regrow. Removing it immediately caught two `}: any` prop stubs that a
grep for "as any" had missed; those mocks now use the real components'
exported prop types.
`as unknown as T` survives in five places, each a test deliberately
feeding invalid input (an undefined breakdown, missing tierData, a bogus
leave type). CLAUDE.md now documents that as the only accepted escape,
and points at the factories.
interface PollResponse in useScraperFetch.ts is exported so its shape can
be derived rather than duplicated -- pollScraperSession declares
Promise<unknown>, so there was no other honest way to type it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RXMhc9nT6sNz1SL4j8dznL
Branches were the weakest metric and had the least headroom above the
85% floor. These are tests for decision paths that were genuinely
unexercised, not padding.
The largest gaps were systemic rather than per-file: the
`err instanceof Error ? ... : fallback` branch was untested across eight
data hooks, useVacationDays had no dedicated test file at all, and
Calendar.tsx's missing-workspace/child/personalData fallbacks were never
hit.
Left deliberately uncovered, with reasons: `?? fallback` guards whose
fallback cannot occur given how the value is constructed upstream, and
guards behind buttons that are disabled whenever the guard would matter.
Reaching those means calling handlers directly, which tests the test
rather than the app.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RXMhc9nT6sNz1SL4j8dznL
Works through every numbered item in NextSteps260913.md section 3, plus the
three known verification issues in section 4.1.
Surface what the backend already computed:
- 3.1 render surplus_advice in PlanResults, mirroring the shortfall remedies
- 3.2 surface VacationBalance.is_assumed so assumed statutory years are visible
- 3.3 age-4 expiry given the proposed plan, via a new Age4Projection reusing
the existing _age4_projections arithmetic (Dashboard stat verified, not rebuilt)
Calendar cluster (one pass over the holiday data):
- new GET /api/calendar/days exposing roda dagar, klamdagar and day overrides,
paginated four years at a time
- 3.4 shade roda dagar/klamdagar, with R/K badges so colour is not the only signal
- 3.6 click-to-override behind an explicit mode toggle, leaving drag multi-select intact
- 3.7 click month/year to advance
- 3.8 per-year red-days list in Settings, statutory days plus overrides
i18n:
- 3.5 five backend-generated Swedish surfaces converted to message_key + data,
following the tips_service pattern; old string fields replaced, not kept
Flexible wishes (3.9):
- PLANNING_ENGINE_SPEC section 10: window_mode, candidate search, cost function,
deterministic tie-break, two-pass ordering, test matrix rows 15-24
- backend: entity, migration 006, _FULL_SCHEMA sync, repository, allocator
- frontend: season-preset toggle in WishEditor, unplaced outcome rendering
Fixes (4.1):
- pin typecheck to the local tsc rather than npx resolving a newer TypeScript
- ignore generated coverage/ and dist/ in the ESLint flat config
- fix the flaky usePlanApply test properly, with waitFor rather than a retry
Tests: backend 361 -> 404, frontend 540 -> 704. Coverage 89.47% -> 96.52% lines.
Not yet verified in a browser.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RXMhc9nT6sNz1SL4j8dznL
jacobh2