reallocate_vacation_by_value swaps vacation onto higher-value dates 1-for-1
with parental-leave days. Add an Easter period with no vacation left and the
planner quietly takes vacation off the summer period, puts foraldrapenning
there, and spends it on the Easter klamdagar. Nothing said so.
sync_plan already emitted the evidence -- paired 'retyped' changes -- but
PlanChange.kind's 'retyped' existed only as a type declaration, rendered
nowhere, with no copy in either locale.
findVacationSwaps pairs a vacation -> FP retype with an FP -> vacation retype
for the same parent, aggregating multiple pairs into one group and ignoring
any retype that is not a genuine two-sided swap. summarizeVacationSwaps names
the periods via the existing resolveWishName, so a preset wish is
re-translated rather than shown raw, and falls back to dates when no single
wish resolves -- never a uuid. It joins the existing Calendar sync toast
rather than adding a second toast system.
Frontend 1356 tests, coverage 98.22 / 94.95 / 92.31 / 98.22, above all gates.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YZaX6xbuMEMXuyKA1fq2Mm
The planner knew exactly how many semesterdagar a parent was about to
forfeit and never placed a single day to prevent it. It also had no
weekend-wrap logic at all: REASON_VACATION_WRAP_WEEKEND was stamped on
every tier-3 interior vacation day, including a lone Tuesday in February.
Two changes.
Spend better. A workday adjacent to a free stretch, or in the middle of a
gap of three or fewer fenced by free days, now takes vacation --
_vacation_bridge_reason, consulted for every parent type. This departs
from spec 6.1's "wrapping suppressed for hourly": the FP-preservation
argument is salary-type independent, only the pay argument was hourly-moot.
In a both-parents window, both now take vacation on such a date rather
than one paying with FP. After funding, reallocate_vacation_by_value swaps
vacation onto higher-ranked dates 1-for-1 with FP days, so which dates hold
vacation improves while how many never drops -- greedy first, re-timed
after, never withheld. An invariant test asserts the count can only rise.
Name the losses. A new pass proposes concrete dates for vacation that would
otherwise expire, current year only, ranked red-day bridge then weekend
bridge then interior, later dates first. They ride on
PlanProposal.rescue_days, kept off `days` so nothing downstream commits
them, and surface on the Dashboard with accept-one, accept-all (one
batched /api/plan/apply, not N) and dismiss. Dismissal reuses the
tip_dismissal table, keyed on (parent, year) identity rather than the
group's dates -- those are recomputed from the whole plan's residual on
every propose, so date-hashing made dismissal self-defeating. Dismiss does
not bump the plan version; it changes no data and must not trigger a write.
Measured on the seeded demo: 12 forfeiting days for one parent now yield 12
proposed dates, all Fridays or Mondays. Total vacation placed is unchanged
at 203 days, confirming the reallocation only re-times.
Three defects here were found by driving a browser, while 2273 unit tests
passed -- all three lived in the seam between layers that unit tests mock
away. Adds API-level tests over the real request sequence. Rate limiting is
now off in tests (one file consumed the whole registration budget) with the
suite's first real 429 assertion.
PROPOSE_VS_SYNC_BUG.md documents a pre-existing, unfixed issue found along
the way: Dashboard figures swing on the first sync with no user action.
Backend 946 tests, frontend 1341, coverage above all gates.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YZaX6xbuMEMXuyKA1fq2Mm
Warnings such as "vacation days at risk of being lost" kept showing after
the planner had already resolved them. The planner itself was firing
correctly -- PlanSyncProvider syncs on every plan-input change -- so the
fault was in the warnings, in two independent places.
The vacation-expiry warning was computed before allocation. It read
`vacation_forfeiting`, which the loader derives from already-committed
usage, while `_assign_tier3` deliberately spends at-risk vacation days
first precisely to avoid that forfeiture. The figure therefore counted
days the plan was in the middle of saving. `_vacation_expiry_warnings`
now subtracts the vacation days this run actually placed for that parent
and year, clamped at zero -- sound because the bank is FIFO, so a day
spent in year Y retires one expiring day one-for-one. The full
carry-forward simulation is still not duplicated inside the ledger.
The Dashboard then never refreshed them. Its proposal came from a
one-shot effect guarded by `proposal === null`, with no planVersion
dependency, so the card kept rendering the pre-replan warning until
remount -- while `syncPlan` was already returning a fresh proposal that
both call sites discarded. PlanSyncProvider now exposes that proposal
behind a monotonic counter, and usePlanProposal prefers it once any sync
has completed, keeping `propose()` for the first load.
Also adds a manual recompute button to Settings, which only bumps
planVersion and reports what the resulting sync did, and fixes partner
add/remove never bumping planVersion at all -- that gap meant gaining or
losing a parent never re-ran the allocator, though it changes who days
can be assigned to. Rename stays cosmetic.
Verified in the browser: a 2031 warning of 15 days dropped to 12 after
three vacation days were planned, without a reload.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014jPFUcCJ5AKXmPVC1anhXe
Several vacation_expiring warnings rendered with an identical title and a
body without the parent, so two warnings for the same year read as
duplicates. The backend already sends parent_personal_data_uuid; the
strings just never used it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Free days (Sat/Sun/red days, subject to DayOverride) can never be
vacation, and can only be parental leave when the workspace opts in via
take_pl_on_red_days. The allocator already honoured this; the hand-pin
path bypassed it entirely.
- PlanningService gains optional workspace_repo/day_override_repo deps
and _reject_illegal_free_day, enforced in add_planned_day and update.
Reuses allocation_service.is_free_day rather than re-deriving it, and
no-ops when the deps are unset so existing callers are unaffected.
- update_planned_day had no ValidationError handler at all, so a
validation failure there 500'd instead of 422'ing. Fixed.
- Calendar filters the pin write loop by the day's isFree; the modal
explains free days stay off, and that pinning opts a day out of
automatic re-planning.
Vacation days at risk of forfeiture were computed and sent over the
wire but never rendered: an at-risk column with the age-out/over-cap
split, and a dashboard key figure.
PlanProposal.warnings was likewise parsed but rendered nowhere, for all
three kinds. Adds PlanWarningCard in a Risks section above the tips,
with parent names resolved and dates formatted.
POST /api/plan/sync now fires from the workspace layer on every
plan-input change rather than only from Calendar, so a Settings edit or
a pinned-day save re-plans day types instead of merely refetching.
Overlapping bumps coalesce into one trailing run; a rejection cannot
wedge the in-flight guard. eviction_preview was silently dropped by the
frontend despite always being on the wire, and is now surfaced through
context.
Verified: backend 890 passed (91.49% coverage), frontend 1297 passed,
ruff/eslint/tsc clean. Browser-checked in Swedish and English.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JVQx4NUvPbJhn6UcvRd2QY
A yearly-repeating period kept the same calendar date instead of the same
weekday: 2026-10-05..10-11 (Mon-Sun) recurred as 2027-10-05..10-11 (Tue-Mon)
rather than 2027-10-04..10-10. The snap added in 224fe7a only ever covered
window_mode == 'fixed'; 'flexible' wishes were unaligned at both stages.
project_window now snaps both modes. A flexible bound is still a bounding
range, but it keeps its weekday alignment year over year with its span held
fixed, so the search space never shrinks and a bound that is exactly as long
as the target (its only candidate) repeats week-shaped.
_rank_candidate gains a Monday-start term between cost and start, so equal-cost
candidates break on week alignment instead of "earliest". It sits after cost
deliberately: a cheaper non-Monday start still wins, because red days outrank
alignment.
_reuse_already_funded_window would otherwise freeze a pre-existing misaligned
placement forever, so it now releases a year whose reuse winner is misaligned
when a fresh search ranks strictly better -- never when one of its days is
pinned or excluded, so a deliberate per-day override always survives.
Migration 008 realigns flexible series already materialised under the old rule;
projection runs once, at create/update, so nothing repairs them on read.
Alongside this, the planner now says when it moved a period to catch red days.
WindowOutcome carries shift_gain_days (the saving over the naive bound-start
placement) and the calendar toasts it, once, on the sync that decided it.
A fixed window is never auto-moved -- its "exact requested placement,
unconditionally" guarantee stands -- but its shift suggestion is no longer
hidden behind a shortfall, so a fully-funded one can surface a cheaper week too.
Editing a period in the popover now also sends window_mode: 'fixed' with a
matching target. Preset chips create flexible wishes; dragging one down to an
exact week left it flexible with a week-long bound, which is the degenerate
single-candidate case that produced the reported dates.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DXPBfr1v7F71t6QcbHCaaT
Three strands of work that grew together across the same settings screen and
API client, so they land as one change.
Per-year preschool planning days ("studiedagar"): new table, repository
(SQLite + Postgres), service, router and migration 007, plus the hooks and
Settings UI to plan and record them per child and year. Allocation now
reserves the recorded figure for a year where one exists and only falls back
to the child-level estimate otherwise, marking that fallback as assumed.
Partner invitations: workspaces issue and list invitations, registration
accepts an invite token to join the inviter's workspace instead of creating a
personal one, and a /join/:token page plus the settings invite panel drive it.
Vacation forfeiture: tips and the dashboard now distinguish days a parent
genuinely loses from days that merely age, so the warning stops firing on
balances that were never at risk.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The dashboard stated the loss and stopped there. With Jacob at 48/48 savable
and 24 days over the cap, and Amelie at 3/48 with 45 days of headroom, those
24 days are not lost at all — transferring them before the 4th birthday saves
every one. The app never said so.
`_rule_age4_pooling_loss` already computed exactly that advice, bounded by the
FK-reported `transferable_days_left`, in finished Swedish and English. It never
ran: `age4_pooling_tip_min_child_age_years` held it back until the child turned
2. The calendar IS the plan, so gate on the plan instead — the noise case is a
newborn with nothing planned, not a young child whose parents have planned in
detail. `age4_pooling_tip_min_planned_days` (20) replaces the age gate.
Both variants drop to `info`. A projection four years out should not read as a
verdict on the user's planning; the hero carries the alarm, this card carries
the advice. The copy now leads with "plans change, this is only a projection"
and closes by pointing at keeping balances up to date, since parents will come
back and record what they actually took.
- Suppress `preserve_for_age_4` whenever `age4_pooling_loss` fires for the same
child. The pooling tip states the same loss plus the remedy and the correct
per-parent cap, so emitting both gave two contradictory "you're losing N
days" figures.
- `preserve_for_age_4` now sends `parent_cap` and its copy interpolates it. It
claimed "only 96 days can be saved" — false for a two-parent family, where
the cap is 48 each, as the Age4Bars card two rows below already showed.
- The hero grows a "How to save them" line derived from the tip itself, so the
two can never disagree on the number. Dismissing the tip retires both.
- "Försäkringskassan" in that line links to FK's BankID login carrying a `goto`
to Min föräldrapenning — the e-service showing "Dagar ni kan föra över" —
so the transfer is one click away. `translate()` returns a plain string and
word order differs between locales, so the anchor's position travels inside
the template as `{fk}` and the rendered string is split around it.
Verified in the browser: hero, link target, tip severity and the absence of
`preserve_for_age_4`, in both languages and at 390px. Note the demo seed cannot
reach this shape — it gives the surplus parent no FK snapshot at all.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DXPBfr1v7F71t6QcbHCaaT
The scraper never read "överlåtbara dagar" from Försäkringskassan. It only
visited ansok-och-planera-foraldrapenning#/valjdagar and derived the
reserved/transferable split in build_snapshot, assuming transferable days
are spent before reserved ones. On real data that gave 49 for the user and
0 for the partner where FK states 129 and 71.
The assumption cannot be repaired: reserved-first, transferable-first,
proportional and cap-based models were all checked against real figures and
none reproduces FK's accounting (reserved-first fits the partner but is 10
days off for the user). FK publishes the real numbers per parent per tier on
the min-foraldrapenning page, which the scraper had never visited.
- Scrape the "Dagar ni kan föra över" panel after the valjdagar extraction,
summing sjukpenningnivå + lägstanivå per parent. The totals are not
literals on the page. Parse only direct-child <p> elements: the first
group embeds a tooltip with decoy "45 dagar"/"90 dagar" text.
- build_snapshot accepts the reported value and derives reserved days from
it; the old arithmetic remains only as a fallback. An implausible FK value
degrades to that fallback rather than failing the fetch.
- Record provenance in transferable_days_reported (migration 006) and badge
derived values as estimates in the dashboard breakdown. Drop the footnote's
claim that at most 150 days are transferable — real data contradicts it as
a per-family figure.
- Select the child's section by name when FK lists several; never guess.
Verified against a live BankID scrape: scraped 240/101/139 with 129
transferable, deduced partner 240/169/71 with 71, both flagged as reported.
Incidental fixes found along the way:
- The fetch router never forwarded the partner's transferable figure to
persist_partner_deduction, so the partner's stored snapshot would have kept
the flawed split even once the parse landed.
- 'deduced' snapshots were labelled "Manually entered" by a two-way ternary
over a three-value union. Replaced with a compiler-checked exhaustive map.
- Alembic resolved its database from alembic.ini alone, ignoring
APP_SQLITE_PATH, so migrations silently targeted the developer's real
database even when pointed elsewhere. env.py now resolves it, preferring
-x sqlalchemy.url, then a real APP_SQLITE_PATH, then the ini value.
- backend/captures/ was not ignored: the root pattern was anchored as
/captures/ despite a comment saying scraper dumps must never be tracked.
- CLAUDE.md quoted test counts and coverage percentages that had gone stale,
which made a correct verification report look suspect. Gate thresholds kept.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DXPBfr1v7F71t6QcbHCaaT
The translate function learns a {count|singular|plural} form, and the
24 strings that hedged with "dag(ar)", "day(s)" or "week(s)" now pick
the right word from the number they interpolate, in both languages.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XBRLomdLK9jF7wU7a8AA6H
The sign-in page becomes a plain centred column with the brand mark
and a segmented login/register switch, modals lose their last inner
boxes, the red-days list collapses every year but the current one,
and the retired components' CSS, an unused list component and 23
unreferenced translation keys are removed. ARCHITECTURE.md documents
the Almanacka styling conventions and the per-year balance rule.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XBRLomdLK9jF7wU7a8AA6H
Settings becomes Barn & familj, Saldon, Kalender & språk and
Undantag & röda dagar, each saving on its own. A BalanceFlow
component owns fetching from Försäkringskassan and manual entry for
every parent, used by the Saldon panel and by the onboarding wizard,
which now runs without the app chrome. The red-days list and the
day-override form merge into one exceptions view, the vacation table
becomes wrapping rows that fit a phone, and the BankID modal speaks
translated status lines instead of emoji.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XBRLomdLK9jF7wU7a8AA6H
The dashboard now leads with a typographic headline, three key
figures, per-parent age-4 bars and one row per year until the fourth
birthday. Each year row shows the timeline bands beside each parent's
parental-leave days left at year end and vacation days left, carried
over or expiring, and opens into a per-parent table with that year's
wish outcomes. Tips become a plain list and absorb the planner's
surplus advice; "Detaljer" keeps the metrics and a balance snapshot
for every parent. The separate plan-proposal fold and the
type-count table are gone.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XBRLomdLK9jF7wU7a8AA6H
Day cells lose their borders and fills; red days, klämdagar and
Saturdays are told apart by the numeral's ink with a 12px R/K mark,
today is a filled circle, overrides and exclusions mark the numeral.
Bands carry their funding type by fill, ink and hatching and their
owner by a left cap. The preset rail becomes a chip row, the legend a
help popover, the period popover's three delete buttons fold behind
one "Ta bort…", and solo users pick a type directly in the day modal.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XBRLomdLK9jF7wU7a8AA6H
New token system in global.css (near-white surfaces, one ink-blue
accent, no sub-12px type), self-hosted Schibsted Grotesk, rewritten
primitives (buttons, fields, modal shell, segmented, disclosure,
skeleton), a borderless 56px header with an SV | EN language toggle,
an Icon component replacing glyphs, page skeletons that keep the
layout during loading, and leave-type colours moved out of TS into
CSS variables. Feature blocks keep their structure for later phases.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Taking one day out of a period the planner placed did nothing that
lasted: the period still asked for a full week, so the next sync put the
day straight back. The option was disabled rather than lying about it.
A removed day is now recorded as its own thing — no leave for this
parent, this child, this date — and the planner honours it on every
later sync. It is kept apart from the working-day overrides, which
answer a different question about the calendar rather than about the
plan.
The day belongs to the parent whose band was clicked, so removing one
parent's day leaves their partner's alone; where both parents were to be
off on one funding arrangement, the partner is simply funded on their
own instead. A removed day shortens what the period is asking for rather
than counting as a day the plan failed to find, so the advice about
closing a shortfall does not start arguing for a day nobody wants.
Nothing is removed without a way back: the toast undoes it, and the day
itself is marked in the calendar and offers to restore.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ei7gCZzdd751uZtPzb1Pep
A repeating period was a single row that the planner expanded into one
window per year at read time, so no year had anywhere to differ from the
others. Editing one year rewrote them all, and removing a year in the
middle had to split the wish in two. Neither survives contact with the
thing this app is for: Easter moves, and the cheapest week is not the
same week every year.
Each year is now its own row, linked by a series id. Editing one year
touches one row; editing the series re-projects the rest from it.
Removing a year is one delete. The weekday snap is worked out once, when
the rows are made, and stored, so a row now says what it means rather
than being re-derived on every read. Recurrence stops being a stored
field and becomes what it always was in practice — an instruction at
create and update time; whether a period repeats is whether it belongs
to a series.
Migration 004 rebuilds the table and expands the existing rows, keeping
each original row as its first year so the days already planned against
it still point somewhere. A Feb 29 anchor recurring into a common year
used to raise out of the allocator; it clamps now.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ei7gCZzdd751uZtPzb1Pep
Three changes to calendar editing, too interleaved in the same files to
land separately.
Giving the same days to the second parent rewrote the first parent's
days instead of adding their own. The save looked the existing day up
against whoever was logged in rather than the parent being saved for, so
parent A's leave turned into parent B's vacation. The parent choice now
lives with the lookup, and two parents on the same dates produce two
rows and two bands.
Drawing a period by hand meant naming a day type up front. It now asks
who is off and lets the planner fund it, as a one-off period the sync
places, with double days offered when both parents are off and priced
honestly in the hint. Pinning an exact day type is still there, moved
behind Advanced, and editing a pinned day goes straight back to it.
Removing a period offered only the two extremes. There are now three
choices: this day, this year's period, or every year. Taking one year
out of a repeating period narrows it, or splits it in two when the year
is in the middle; where a scope cannot be expressed it is disabled with
a reason rather than doing something surprising.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ei7gCZzdd751uZtPzb1Pep
A year that cannot afford the whole week was already funded as far as it
goes rather than dropped; there is now a test that says so, across four
years of a repeating wish where only three and a half are affordable.
The advice to move a window onto the red days was looking three days
either side, which can never find Easter. It now searches four weeks
either way — enough for Easter's drift plus the weekday snap — and ranks
placements with the same cost model flexible periods are already placed
with, naming the dates and the days gained.
None of this reached the screen before. The overview now lists each short
window with its gap and the ranked remedies underneath, one line each.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ei7gCZzdd751uZtPzb1Pep
The status on the right of each public holiday is now a button. Clicking
it writes an override for that one date, and clicking it back removes the
override rather than storing a row that agrees with the almanac. Because
an override is keyed on an absolute date, the same holiday in other years
is left alone — which is what was asked for and needed no schema change.
The separate badge saying an override exists stays, so the fact that a
day has been changed is not carried by the button alone.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ei7gCZzdd751uZtPzb1Pep
Asking for a full week off never spent anything on the Saturday, the
Sunday or a holiday, and a test now says so outright rather than leaving
it to be rediscovered. Those days are free because vacation cannot be
taken on a day that is not a working day.
Parental benefit is a payment rather than a schedule, though, so it can
be drawn on a red day to turn an unpaid day off into a paid one — at the
cost of a day the family would otherwise keep. That is now a workspace
setting, off by default, and it never reaches for a vacation day. With it
off the planner behaves exactly as before.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ei7gCZzdd751uZtPzb1Pep
The month can now be reached in one click instead of paging back through
the year. The button sits left of the month dropdown and sizes to its
label, so Idag and Today both fit.
Opening a period showed the wish's first year rather than the occurrence
that was clicked: a 2028 week of a yearly wish opened on 2026, and a
flexible period opened on its bounding range instead of where the planner
put it. The popover now prefills from the clicked band's own dates.
Saving a yearly wish keeps its anchor year, since the edited dates
describe the recurring pattern and not one occurrence — moving a single
year is a separate choice that does not exist yet.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ei7gCZzdd751uZtPzb1Pep
Onboarding asks explicitly for one or two parents and shows one card per
parent for balances; the balance form is per parent with inline
validation; the partner can be filled from the FK deduction or added
from it. Settings and Dashboard reuse the same form.
CSS: bare buttons carry no colour any more; buttons, cards, choice
cards, fields, alerts, badges, eyebrow and modal chrome are defined once
in primitives.css. Media queries live only in responsive.css. A style
guard test blocks hex, !important and stray media queries. Bilingual
fixes: calendar selects size by content, header no longer wraps. Vitest
is capped at four workers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Deleting a period or a day went through the browser's own confirmation box.
It halts the page while it is open, which meant the delete path could not be
driven by anything automated, and it looks nothing like the rest of the app.
Both now ask inline: the first click offers the choice, and only the second
one deletes. That matters more than it did, since deleting a period now takes
its days with it.
A partner added during onboarding appeared as "Parent 2" on the overview
until you navigated away and back: the members list had been fetched before
that partner existed and nothing refetched when the wizard finished. The
fallback was doing its job; it was covering for stale data.
A period drawn on the calendar is measured in days, but a shortfall was
reported in the weeks the engine had rounded it to, so seven days came back
as three weeks. It now reports what was actually asked for.
Only ninety-six days survive a child's fourth birthday, and with two parents
that is forty-eight each rather than a shared pool. A parent sitting on sixty
days while the other has ten therefore forfeits twelve that the family could
have kept, and nothing said so.
The advice leads with taking the days as leave before the birthday, which
turns them into actual time at home, and offers transferring only as the
fallback that merely preserves them. The transferable figure is bounded by
what Försäkringskassan actually reports as transferable, since the reserved
days cannot move, and the copy says plainly that a transfer happens there and
not in this app. Without the partner's figures the tip hedges rather than
inventing a number.
Registering used to land you on a bare form asking for a child, with no hint
what came next. A short wizard now walks through the child, whether you are
planning alone or together, and where the day balances come from: fetched from
Försäkringskassan, entered by hand, or skipped — and if skipped, the figures
carry a badge saying they are estimates until real ones arrive.
Fetching is the first option rather than a hidden one, so the scraper is on by
default and the script that used to force it on no longer needs to.
Planning and Tips lose their tabs. Authoring moved to the calendar and the
figures moved to the overview, so both pages were only a second way to reach
what is already on screen; their routes now redirect rather than dead-end. The
dead translations went with them.
Dates also follow the chosen language now instead of always formatting as
Swedish.
The page opened with generic tiles and a bar reading forty-eight of ninety-six
weeks, which was neither weeks nor connected to the age-four ceiling it appeared
to describe. It is replaced by one headline and a bar per parent, in days,
against each parent's own savable limit as the server reports it.
The headline has two framings on the same arithmetic. Before anything is
planned it says what there is to plan and what will be lost without a plan,
because on the first day almost the whole entitlement is technically at risk
and saying so bluntly reads as an accusation. Once a plan exists it warns about
the days genuinely at stake.
A timeline of the years to the fourth birthday answers what the next four years
look like, which a month-at-a-time calendar cannot. Shortfalls, surplus advice
and balances sit below the fold, read-only: applying is automatic now, so a
second apply button would be a way to get two different answers.
Rejection messages move to one shared place that resolves a parent's name, so
an identifier can no longer surface in their place.
Planning used to mean filling in a wish list on one tab, pressing a button to
see a suggestion, then pressing another to accept it — with nothing on screen
telling you whether a plan was active. Dragging a range on the calendar now
creates the period directly, clicking a band opens it for editing, and each
change is recomputed and saved in one step. A period repeats never or yearly,
matching what the planner can actually express.
Clicking a day edits that day: its funding type, which pins it so the planner
leaves it alone, and whether the day counts as worked or off. That switch used
to be a mode covering the whole grid, which is what made the calendar confusing.
The season presets move to a rail beside the grid. Picking one lets the planner
choose the placement, then jumps there and flashes it, rather than asking the
user to guess dates the engine already knows.
A sync that funds nothing now says so, naming the period and how many days it
fell short, instead of leaving the screen unchanged and looking broken.
A six-week summer used to render as a row of disconnected bars, because bars
were derived per week row and grouped by parent and day type. They carried no
identity and ignored pointer events, so there was nothing to click. Bands now
group by the wish that produced them, bridge the weekends and red days inside
a period, and round only the ends that are genuinely the first and last day.
Each day still shows what pays for it, and a hand-edited day is marked as one
the planner will leave alone.
Sundays and public holidays now render red and Saturdays a neutral grey,
following the printed almanacka people compare against, and a holiday's name
is visible in the cell rather than hidden in a tooltip. This also explains the
report that months looked unshaded: weekends had no styling at all, since the
day component handled only red days and klämdagar.
The year selector follows the range the calendar API actually serves instead
of a hardcoded span.
Three changes that together unblock treating a calendar period as one
editable object.
Migration 008 adds `planned_leave_day.wish_id` (nullable, ON DELETE SET NULL)
so a persisted day knows which `leave_wish` produced it, `is_pinned` to mark a
day the user hand-edited, and `leave_wish.target_days` so a period drawn on a
calendar need not be a whole number of weeks. Apply-time identity still keys on
day_type/is_dubbeldag only, so a wish_id-only difference is a metadata update
rather than a collision.
The age-4 savable ceiling was applying the per-child figure of 96 to each
parent's pool, modelling a two-parent family as able to save 192 days past the
child's fourth birthday. `resolve_age4_savable_cap` is now the single place
that decides 48 (couple with two parents) versus 96 (everyone else), and both
AnalyticsService and the allocator read it.
Migration 009 drops `workspace.planning_goal` and `leave_wish.goal_override`.
The allocator's tier-3 policy collapses to one rule; `salary_type` still
branches, since that reflects what a vacation day actually costs a parent
rather than a user preference.
Clicking the month or year label only ever stepped forward
(`month + 1`, `year + 1`), so the only way back was the prev-month arrow,
one month at a time. Jumping back a year was impossible.
Both labels are now selects, so any month or year is one click away in
either direction. Selects rather than +/- steppers because the app
already uses them elsewhere, and because stepping in a second direction
would still not give the "quickly jump" part of the original intent.
Year options are bounded to 2026-2055, the calendar cache range: outside
it the backend raises UncachedYearError and returns 422, so offering
those years would hand the user an error instead of a calendar.
The prev/next month arrows are unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RXMhc9nT6sNz1SL4j8dznL
Plan.tsx's handlers swallowed their rejections and onUpdate was typed to
return void, so WishEditor could not observe a failed save. It inferred
the outcome instead -- comparing the draft it sent against the next
wishes prop, and reading "isSaving went false without a match" as
failure. That coupled save status to refetch timing and could not tell a
network error from a slow refresh.
The handlers now return their promise, onUpdate accepts
`void | Promise<void>` so void-returning callers still typecheck, and
WishEditor awaits and catches the real outcome. The inference machinery
(sentDraftRef, prevIsSavingRef and the comparison effect) is removed
rather than left alongside, since two sources of truth can disagree.
The save/refetch/save loop guard is untouched: it lives in the draft
reseed effect, which only fills a row that has no draft yet, and saves
only ever originate from an explicit onChange. Added a comment saying so.
A failed row now keeps its edit and offers an explicit retry, rather than
requiring another edit to retrigger the debounce. Per-row failures report
inline only -- reporting them in the page banner too would double-report
the same error.
Also removes wishEditor.saveButton/savingButton, dead since the per-row
Save button was replaced by auto-save.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RXMhc9nT6sNz1SL4j8dznL
Both screens showed an "expiring at age 4" number under near-identical
labels, and they disagreed -- 143 on the Dashboard versus 100 on the Plan
tab for the same parent. Both were correct: the Dashboard reflects the
saved plan, the Plan tab a proposal that has not been applied and which
simulates future recurring wishes.
The numbers are left untouched; forcing them to agree would make one of
them wrong. Instead each label now states its own basis ("om nuvarande
plan följs" / "om detta förslag tillämpas"), and the Plan tab's intro
says outright that the saved plan may differ, and why.
Tests assert the distinguishing copy on both screens so the two cannot
silently drift back to indistinguishable labels.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RXMhc9nT6sNz1SL4j8dznL
sv.ts/en.ts were single 602-line files that every feature had to edit,
making concurrent work on unrelated screens collide constantly. Split
both into per-domain modules (common, auth, calendar, dashboard,
settings, plan, wishEditor, tips) composed by an index that preserves
the existing `import { sv } from './sv'` specifier, so no consumer
changes.
Typing still catches drift in both directions: each en module is checked
against TranslationKey, and the composed catalogue must satisfy
Record<TranslationKey, string>.
All 433 keys and their values are byte-identical to the originals,
verified by diffing the parsed catalogues against the pre-split files.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RXMhc9nT6sNz1SL4j8dznL
jacobh2