Onboarding asks explicitly for one or two parents and shows one card per
parent for balances; the balance form is per parent with inline
validation; the partner can be filled from the FK deduction or added
from it. Settings and Dashboard reuse the same form.
CSS: bare buttons carry no colour any more; buttons, cards, choice
cards, fields, alerts, badges, eyebrow and modal chrome are defined once
in primitives.css. Media queries live only in responsive.css. A style
guard test blocks hex, !important and stray media queries. Bilingual
fixes: calendar selects size by content, header no longer wraps. Vitest
is capped at four workers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Deleting a period or a day went through the browser's own confirmation box.
It halts the page while it is open, which meant the delete path could not be
driven by anything automated, and it looks nothing like the rest of the app.
Both now ask inline: the first click offers the choice, and only the second
one deletes. That matters more than it did, since deleting a period now takes
its days with it.
A partner added during onboarding appeared as "Parent 2" on the overview
until you navigated away and back: the members list had been fetched before
that partner existed and nothing refetched when the wizard finished. The
fallback was doing its job; it was covering for stale data.
A period drawn on the calendar is measured in days, but a shortfall was
reported in the weeks the engine had rounded it to, so seven days came back
as three weeks. It now reports what was actually asked for.
Only ninety-six days survive a child's fourth birthday, and with two parents
that is forty-eight each rather than a shared pool. A parent sitting on sixty
days while the other has ten therefore forfeits twelve that the family could
have kept, and nothing said so.
The advice leads with taking the days as leave before the birthday, which
turns them into actual time at home, and offers transferring only as the
fallback that merely preserves them. The transferable figure is bounded by
what Försäkringskassan actually reports as transferable, since the reserved
days cannot move, and the copy says plainly that a transfer happens there and
not in this app. Without the partner's figures the tip hedges rather than
inventing a number.
Registering used to land you on a bare form asking for a child, with no hint
what came next. A short wizard now walks through the child, whether you are
planning alone or together, and where the day balances come from: fetched from
Försäkringskassan, entered by hand, or skipped — and if skipped, the figures
carry a badge saying they are estimates until real ones arrive.
Fetching is the first option rather than a hidden one, so the scraper is on by
default and the script that used to force it on no longer needs to.
Planning and Tips lose their tabs. Authoring moved to the calendar and the
figures moved to the overview, so both pages were only a second way to reach
what is already on screen; their routes now redirect rather than dead-end. The
dead translations went with them.
Dates also follow the chosen language now instead of always formatting as
Swedish.
The page opened with generic tiles and a bar reading forty-eight of ninety-six
weeks, which was neither weeks nor connected to the age-four ceiling it appeared
to describe. It is replaced by one headline and a bar per parent, in days,
against each parent's own savable limit as the server reports it.
The headline has two framings on the same arithmetic. Before anything is
planned it says what there is to plan and what will be lost without a plan,
because on the first day almost the whole entitlement is technically at risk
and saying so bluntly reads as an accusation. Once a plan exists it warns about
the days genuinely at stake.
A timeline of the years to the fourth birthday answers what the next four years
look like, which a month-at-a-time calendar cannot. Shortfalls, surplus advice
and balances sit below the fold, read-only: applying is automatic now, so a
second apply button would be a way to get two different answers.
Rejection messages move to one shared place that resolves a parent's name, so
an identifier can no longer surface in their place.
Planning used to mean filling in a wish list on one tab, pressing a button to
see a suggestion, then pressing another to accept it — with nothing on screen
telling you whether a plan was active. Dragging a range on the calendar now
creates the period directly, clicking a band opens it for editing, and each
change is recomputed and saved in one step. A period repeats never or yearly,
matching what the planner can actually express.
Clicking a day edits that day: its funding type, which pins it so the planner
leaves it alone, and whether the day counts as worked or off. That switch used
to be a mode covering the whole grid, which is what made the calendar confusing.
The season presets move to a rail beside the grid. Picking one lets the planner
choose the placement, then jumps there and flashes it, rather than asking the
user to guess dates the engine already knows.
A sync that funds nothing now says so, naming the period and how many days it
fell short, instead of leaving the screen unchanged and looking broken.
A six-week summer used to render as a row of disconnected bars, because bars
were derived per week row and grouped by parent and day type. They carried no
identity and ignored pointer events, so there was nothing to click. Bands now
group by the wish that produced them, bridge the weekends and red days inside
a period, and round only the ends that are genuinely the first and last day.
Each day still shows what pays for it, and a hand-edited day is marked as one
the planner will leave alone.
Sundays and public holidays now render red and Saturdays a neutral grey,
following the printed almanacka people compare against, and a holiday's name
is visible in the cell rather than hidden in a tooltip. This also explains the
report that months looked unshaded: weekends had no styling at all, since the
day component handled only red days and klämdagar.
The year selector follows the range the calendar API actually serves instead
of a hardcoded span.
Three changes that together unblock treating a calendar period as one
editable object.
Migration 008 adds `planned_leave_day.wish_id` (nullable, ON DELETE SET NULL)
so a persisted day knows which `leave_wish` produced it, `is_pinned` to mark a
day the user hand-edited, and `leave_wish.target_days` so a period drawn on a
calendar need not be a whole number of weeks. Apply-time identity still keys on
day_type/is_dubbeldag only, so a wish_id-only difference is a metadata update
rather than a collision.
The age-4 savable ceiling was applying the per-child figure of 96 to each
parent's pool, modelling a two-parent family as able to save 192 days past the
child's fourth birthday. `resolve_age4_savable_cap` is now the single place
that decides 48 (couple with two parents) versus 96 (everyone else), and both
AnalyticsService and the allocator read it.
Migration 009 drops `workspace.planning_goal` and `leave_wish.goal_override`.
The allocator's tier-3 policy collapses to one rule; `salary_type` still
branches, since that reflects what a vacation day actually costs a parent
rather than a user preference.
Clicking the month or year label only ever stepped forward
(`month + 1`, `year + 1`), so the only way back was the prev-month arrow,
one month at a time. Jumping back a year was impossible.
Both labels are now selects, so any month or year is one click away in
either direction. Selects rather than +/- steppers because the app
already uses them elsewhere, and because stepping in a second direction
would still not give the "quickly jump" part of the original intent.
Year options are bounded to 2026-2055, the calendar cache range: outside
it the backend raises UncachedYearError and returns 422, so offering
those years would hand the user an error instead of a calendar.
The prev/next month arrows are unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RXMhc9nT6sNz1SL4j8dznL
Plan.tsx's handlers swallowed their rejections and onUpdate was typed to
return void, so WishEditor could not observe a failed save. It inferred
the outcome instead -- comparing the draft it sent against the next
wishes prop, and reading "isSaving went false without a match" as
failure. That coupled save status to refetch timing and could not tell a
network error from a slow refresh.
The handlers now return their promise, onUpdate accepts
`void | Promise<void>` so void-returning callers still typecheck, and
WishEditor awaits and catches the real outcome. The inference machinery
(sentDraftRef, prevIsSavingRef and the comparison effect) is removed
rather than left alongside, since two sources of truth can disagree.
The save/refetch/save loop guard is untouched: it lives in the draft
reseed effect, which only fills a row that has no draft yet, and saves
only ever originate from an explicit onChange. Added a comment saying so.
A failed row now keeps its edit and offers an explicit retry, rather than
requiring another edit to retrigger the debounce. Per-row failures report
inline only -- reporting them in the page banner too would double-report
the same error.
Also removes wishEditor.saveButton/savingButton, dead since the per-row
Save button was replaced by auto-save.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RXMhc9nT6sNz1SL4j8dznL
Both screens showed an "expiring at age 4" number under near-identical
labels, and they disagreed -- 143 on the Dashboard versus 100 on the Plan
tab for the same parent. Both were correct: the Dashboard reflects the
saved plan, the Plan tab a proposal that has not been applied and which
simulates future recurring wishes.
The numbers are left untouched; forcing them to agree would make one of
them wrong. Instead each label now states its own basis ("om nuvarande
plan följs" / "om detta förslag tillämpas"), and the Plan tab's intro
says outright that the saved plan may differ, and why.
Tests assert the distinguishing copy on both screens so the two cannot
silently drift back to indistinguishable labels.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RXMhc9nT6sNz1SL4j8dznL
sv.ts/en.ts were single 602-line files that every feature had to edit,
making concurrent work on unrelated screens collide constantly. Split
both into per-domain modules (common, auth, calendar, dashboard,
settings, plan, wishEditor, tips) composed by an index that preserves
the existing `import { sv } from './sv'` specifier, so no consumer
changes.
Typing still catches drift in both directions: each en module is checked
against TranslationKey, and the composed catalogue must satisfy
Record<TranslationKey, string>.
All 433 keys and their values are byte-identical to the originals,
verified by diffing the parsed catalogues against the pre-split files.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RXMhc9nT6sNz1SL4j8dznL
jacobh2