Deleting a period left every day it had funded behind. The link from a day
back to its period was set to null the instant the period was deleted, so the
days became untraceable before anything could clean them up, and the next
recalculation had no way to know they no longer belonged to anything. Undo had
the same fault for the same reason: the period went, the days stayed, and a
reload showed them still there.
The days are now removed with the period, before the link can be broken. A day
pinned by hand goes too — pinning keeps the planner from quietly retyping a
day, not from being deleted when you delete the period it belongs to, which is
already how an unplanned band behaves.
Three faults, all invisible while the tests passed. Advice was built for the
first child only, so a second child got none. The planned days feeding every
count were fetched once per parent and appended to one list, so a couple's
days were counted twice and every intensity and projection derived from them
was wrong. And dismissing a tip forgot the moment the page reloaded.
Tips now carry the date they concern, lifted from figures the rules already
computed, so a view of a month can show only what applies to it. They are
built per child and identified per child, so the same rule firing for two
children is two separate pieces of advice.
A dismissal is stored against a fingerprint of the facts that were dismissed.
When those facts change the advice returns with its new numbers, rather than
one click silencing a warning about a forfeiture that keeps growing.
Repository.list(**filters) let each implementation pick out the filter
names it understood and silently ignore the rest, so a typo or an
unsupported filter returned every row in the table instead of an error.
This was hit for real: LeaveWishRepository.list(parent_personal_data_uuid
=...) returns every wish in the database, because that implementation
only recognises workspace_id and child_id. A guard written on top of it
would have passed while checking nothing.
All ten implementations now validate against their supported set and
raise ValueError naming the offending key. ValueError rather than a
domain error because passing a filter that does not exist is a
programming bug to fix, not a runtime condition to handle -- it must not
become an HTTP 4xx.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RXMhc9nT6sNz1SL4j8dznL
Works through every numbered item in NextSteps260913.md section 3, plus the
three known verification issues in section 4.1.
Surface what the backend already computed:
- 3.1 render surplus_advice in PlanResults, mirroring the shortfall remedies
- 3.2 surface VacationBalance.is_assumed so assumed statutory years are visible
- 3.3 age-4 expiry given the proposed plan, via a new Age4Projection reusing
the existing _age4_projections arithmetic (Dashboard stat verified, not rebuilt)
Calendar cluster (one pass over the holiday data):
- new GET /api/calendar/days exposing roda dagar, klamdagar and day overrides,
paginated four years at a time
- 3.4 shade roda dagar/klamdagar, with R/K badges so colour is not the only signal
- 3.6 click-to-override behind an explicit mode toggle, leaving drag multi-select intact
- 3.7 click month/year to advance
- 3.8 per-year red-days list in Settings, statutory days plus overrides
i18n:
- 3.5 five backend-generated Swedish surfaces converted to message_key + data,
following the tips_service pattern; old string fields replaced, not kept
Flexible wishes (3.9):
- PLANNING_ENGINE_SPEC section 10: window_mode, candidate search, cost function,
deterministic tie-break, two-pass ordering, test matrix rows 15-24
- backend: entity, migration 006, _FULL_SCHEMA sync, repository, allocator
- frontend: season-preset toggle in WishEditor, unplaced outcome rendering
Fixes (4.1):
- pin typecheck to the local tsc rather than npx resolving a newer TypeScript
- ignore generated coverage/ and dist/ in the ESLint flat config
- fix the flaky usePlanApply test properly, with waitFor rather than a retry
Tests: backend 361 -> 404, frontend 540 -> 704. Coverage 89.47% -> 96.52% lines.
Not yet verified in a browser.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RXMhc9nT6sNz1SL4j8dznL
jacobh2