Post-merge verification of the six merged branches turned up two real
frontend defects and one stale test expectation.
Settings mounts before WorkspaceContext has populated, so PartnerInvitePanel
asked for invitations with an empty workspace id. The empty path segment
collapses in Vite's proxy, FastAPI matches the single-segment workspace route
with workspace_id="invitations", and the UUID parse 422s. Guarded the same way
useWorkspaceMembers already does.
PlanSyncProvider could sync a workspace id seeded from localStorage before
WorkspaceContext refreshed it — a workspace a reseed had since deleted. It
logged the resulting 404 and kept retrying it on every planVersion bump. A 404
now refreshes the workspace context instead, correcting the id rather than
narrating the failure forever.
The drag-create-delete expectation was simply out of date: vacation-typed saves
correctly exclude free days, and targetRange() only skipped months ending on a
Sunday, so a Monday-ending month put a Sunday in the range. It now skips any
free day, computed independently of the calendar data the backend itself reads.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The calendar mixed two kinds of truth in one table. `planned_leave_day` was
simultaneously the allocator's output cache, the user's override store
(`is_pinned`, plus ad-hoc rows with no `wish_id`), and the resource ledger that
analytics and the age-4 maths read. The planner therefore had to ask "am I
allowed to touch this row?" on every sync, and got it wrong at the edges.
Every user assertion is now one `day_assertion` row — a concrete `day_type`
replaces a pinned day, a row with no `wish_id` replaces an ad-hoc day, and
`day_type='none'` replaces `planned_day_exclusion`. `planned_leave_day` becomes
purely derived with a single writer, and `PlanningService.pinned_keys()` is the
single answer to "is this day pinned", used by the allocator's loader, by
`sync_plan` and by the read router alike.
On top of that, every calendar band is now a real event: an ad-hoc band opens
the same full editor as a wish-backed one and saving it promotes it to a
`LeaveWish`, so it can be named, repeated yearly, assigned to either or both
parents, and handed to the planner. "Planering" is a `moveable` toggle plus a
from/to month bound plus a separate lock/unlock action on the days themselves,
replacing a three-rung ladder whose "planner decides" rung set a search window
equal to the drawn dates and so could never move anything.
Bugs found and fixed along the way:
- The plan erased its own history. Fixed windows clip to today, so an elapsed
auto-placed day fell into `stale_keys` and was deleted on the next sync —
and a background sync runs on every workspace load. Past rows are now frozen
and counted as spent.
- Migration 010's downgrade silently destroyed every pinned day and exclusion
(`is_pinned` returned as DEFAULT 0, the exclusion table came back empty,
exit 0, no warning). It now reconstructs both from `day_assertion`, and 009
itemises what it cannot recover before dropping the table.
- Deleting a period left its assertions behind, locking those dates forever
with no UI path to clear them. Wish deletion now clears them by `wish_id`.
- `DayAssertionService` and `LeaveWishService` committed multi-statement writes
without a transaction; a crash mid-write diverged the tables or half-deleted
a series. Both now run in a unit of work.
- A sibling year's shortfall was never surfaced: the toast only inspected the
edited occurrence's outcome, so a fully unfunded later year rendered as an
empty band with no warning.
- A flexible window whose bound had entirely elapsed was dropped from the
proposal with no outcome at all. It now reports as `unplaced`.
- Unlocking a period deleted its days instead of returning them to the planner.
- The e2e global setup posted to a route deleted in this change, which would
have failed the whole suite before its first test.
Gates: backend 938 tests / 91% coverage, frontend 1351 / 97.4 | 92.2 | 94.37 |
97.4. Migrations 009 and 010 audited against a hand-built realistic database:
the upgrade reconciles exactly and a constraint violation fails safe, leaving
the schema at 008.
Not complete. Step 4's toggle, month picker and lock/unlock action are verified
by browser walk and unit tests, but the partial-lock readout was not exercised.
`ideas.md` §7 adds a full plan for the vacation-forfeiture defect (the planner
detects expiring days and then does nothing about them) — not implemented here.
Remaining smaller items are listed in the session's restructure notes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T4wjgbVL4HAC5Rdaw75VbV
Day cells lose their borders and fills; red days, klämdagar and
Saturdays are told apart by the numeral's ink with a 12px R/K mark,
today is a filled circle, overrides and exclusions mark the numeral.
Bands carry their funding type by fill, ink and hatching and their
owner by a left cap. The preset rail becomes a chip row, the legend a
help popover, the period popover's three delete buttons fold behind
one "Ta bort…", and solo users pick a type directly in the day modal.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XBRLomdLK9jF7wU7a8AA6H
New token system in global.css (near-white surfaces, one ink-blue
accent, no sub-12px type), self-hosted Schibsted Grotesk, rewritten
primitives (buttons, fields, modal shell, segmented, disclosure,
skeleton), a borderless 56px header with an SV | EN language toggle,
an Icon component replacing glyphs, page skeletons that keep the
layout during loading, and leave-type colours moved out of TS into
CSS variables. Feature blocks keep their structure for later phases.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Taking one day out of a period the planner placed did nothing that
lasted: the period still asked for a full week, so the next sync put the
day straight back. The option was disabled rather than lying about it.
A removed day is now recorded as its own thing — no leave for this
parent, this child, this date — and the planner honours it on every
later sync. It is kept apart from the working-day overrides, which
answer a different question about the calendar rather than about the
plan.
The day belongs to the parent whose band was clicked, so removing one
parent's day leaves their partner's alone; where both parents were to be
off on one funding arrangement, the partner is simply funded on their
own instead. A removed day shortens what the period is asking for rather
than counting as a day the plan failed to find, so the advice about
closing a shortfall does not start arguing for a day nobody wants.
Nothing is removed without a way back: the toast undoes it, and the day
itself is marked in the calendar and offers to restore.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ei7gCZzdd751uZtPzb1Pep
A repeating period was a single row that the planner expanded into one
window per year at read time, so no year had anywhere to differ from the
others. Editing one year rewrote them all, and removing a year in the
middle had to split the wish in two. Neither survives contact with the
thing this app is for: Easter moves, and the cheapest week is not the
same week every year.
Each year is now its own row, linked by a series id. Editing one year
touches one row; editing the series re-projects the rest from it.
Removing a year is one delete. The weekday snap is worked out once, when
the rows are made, and stored, so a row now says what it means rather
than being re-derived on every read. Recurrence stops being a stored
field and becomes what it always was in practice — an instruction at
create and update time; whether a period repeats is whether it belongs
to a series.
Migration 004 rebuilds the table and expands the existing rows, keeping
each original row as its first year so the days already planned against
it still point somewhere. A Feb 29 anchor recurring into a common year
used to raise out of the allocator; it clamps now.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ei7gCZzdd751uZtPzb1Pep
Three changes to calendar editing, too interleaved in the same files to
land separately.
Giving the same days to the second parent rewrote the first parent's
days instead of adding their own. The save looked the existing day up
against whoever was logged in rather than the parent being saved for, so
parent A's leave turned into parent B's vacation. The parent choice now
lives with the lookup, and two parents on the same dates produce two
rows and two bands.
Drawing a period by hand meant naming a day type up front. It now asks
who is off and lets the planner fund it, as a one-off period the sync
places, with double days offered when both parents are off and priced
honestly in the hint. Pinning an exact day type is still there, moved
behind Advanced, and editing a pinned day goes straight back to it.
Removing a period offered only the two extremes. There are now three
choices: this day, this year's period, or every year. Taking one year
out of a repeating period narrows it, or splits it in two when the year
is in the middle; where a scope cannot be expressed it is disabled with
a reason rather than doing something surprising.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ei7gCZzdd751uZtPzb1Pep
A calendar whose boxes resize is not a calendar. Each week row is its own
grid, and a bare 1fr track takes its minimum from its content, so the one
week containing "Alla helgons dag" had its seven cells squeezed while
every other week's stayed wide. The tracks are now minmax(0, 1fr) and the
cell, the day and the holiday name each refuse to contribute an intrinsic
width; the name clips to an ellipsis and keeps its full text in the title.
Row height follows the same rule: the band lanes are reserved from the
month's tallest week rather than each row's own, so a week with no leave
in it stands as tall as the week beside it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ei7gCZzdd751uZtPzb1Pep
Onboarding asks explicitly for one or two parents and shows one card per
parent for balances; the balance form is per parent with inline
validation; the partner can be filled from the FK deduction or added
from it. Settings and Dashboard reuse the same form.
CSS: bare buttons carry no colour any more; buttons, cards, choice
cards, fields, alerts, badges, eyebrow and modal chrome are defined once
in primitives.css. Media queries live only in responsive.css. A style
guard test blocks hex, !important and stray media queries. Bilingual
fixes: calendar selects size by content, header no longer wraps. Vitest
is capped at four workers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The red-day checks asserted literal colour values copied out of the calendar
stylesheet, so any restyle broke them whether or not it broke the behaviour
they exist to protect. They now resolve the same custom properties the page
uses, and check that a Sunday and a Saturday are styled differently rather
than that they are two particular shades.
The browser suite checked what the app renders but nothing about authoring,
which is the part that changed. It now registers a fresh account and walks
the wizard, including the case where a partner added mid-wizard has to appear
by name without navigating away first, and it drags a range on the calendar,
deletes the period, and reloads to confirm the days really went. Both are
regressions that were found by hand within the last day and would have been
found here instead.
Doing this surfaced that the age-four spec had been asserting on figures that
moved inside a collapsed section, so it had stopped checking anything. The
stale note about the retired tips page went too.
Every serious defect in this project was found by opening the app, most
recently a feature that rendered blank cards to every user while its tests
passed, and a progress bar labelled in the wrong unit. Five checks now run
without a person: that the age-four figures on screen match what the API
computed, that a multi-week period draws as one bar rather than fragments,
that Sundays and holidays are red where Saturdays are not, that no identifier
leaks into visible text, and that no page logs an error.
Three of them were confirmed by reintroducing the original bug and watching
the right test fail. Dates are derived rather than written down: Easter is
computed independently instead of asked of the system under test, and the
fixture period is placed relative to today, so the suite does not expire.
It runs as its own job and does not block a merge until it has proved itself
stable.
jacobh2