Separate user intent from planner output via day assertions

The calendar mixed two kinds of truth in one table. `planned_leave_day` was
simultaneously the allocator's output cache, the user's override store
(`is_pinned`, plus ad-hoc rows with no `wish_id`), and the resource ledger that
analytics and the age-4 maths read. The planner therefore had to ask "am I
allowed to touch this row?" on every sync, and got it wrong at the edges.

Every user assertion is now one `day_assertion` row — a concrete `day_type`
replaces a pinned day, a row with no `wish_id` replaces an ad-hoc day, and
`day_type='none'` replaces `planned_day_exclusion`. `planned_leave_day` becomes
purely derived with a single writer, and `PlanningService.pinned_keys()` is the
single answer to "is this day pinned", used by the allocator's loader, by
`sync_plan` and by the read router alike.

On top of that, every calendar band is now a real event: an ad-hoc band opens
the same full editor as a wish-backed one and saving it promotes it to a
`LeaveWish`, so it can be named, repeated yearly, assigned to either or both
parents, and handed to the planner. "Planering" is a `moveable` toggle plus a
from/to month bound plus a separate lock/unlock action on the days themselves,
replacing a three-rung ladder whose "planner decides" rung set a search window
equal to the drawn dates and so could never move anything.

Bugs found and fixed along the way:

- The plan erased its own history. Fixed windows clip to today, so an elapsed
  auto-placed day fell into `stale_keys` and was deleted on the next sync —
  and a background sync runs on every workspace load. Past rows are now frozen
  and counted as spent.
- Migration 010's downgrade silently destroyed every pinned day and exclusion
  (`is_pinned` returned as DEFAULT 0, the exclusion table came back empty,
  exit 0, no warning). It now reconstructs both from `day_assertion`, and 009
  itemises what it cannot recover before dropping the table.
- Deleting a period left its assertions behind, locking those dates forever
  with no UI path to clear them. Wish deletion now clears them by `wish_id`.
- `DayAssertionService` and `LeaveWishService` committed multi-statement writes
  without a transaction; a crash mid-write diverged the tables or half-deleted
  a series. Both now run in a unit of work.
- A sibling year's shortfall was never surfaced: the toast only inspected the
  edited occurrence's outcome, so a fully unfunded later year rendered as an
  empty band with no warning.
- A flexible window whose bound had entirely elapsed was dropped from the
  proposal with no outcome at all. It now reports as `unplaced`.
- Unlocking a period deleted its days instead of returning them to the planner.
- The e2e global setup posted to a route deleted in this change, which would
  have failed the whole suite before its first test.

Gates: backend 938 tests / 91% coverage, frontend 1351 / 97.4 | 92.2 | 94.37 |
97.4. Migrations 009 and 010 audited against a hand-built realistic database:
the upgrade reconciles exactly and a constraint violation fails safe, leaving
the schema at 008.

Not complete. Step 4's toggle, month picker and lock/unlock action are verified
by browser walk and unit tests, but the partial-lock readout was not exercised.
`ideas.md` §7 adds a full plan for the vacation-forfeiture defect (the planner
detects expiring days and then does nothing about them) — not implemented here.
Remaining smaller items are listed in the session's restructure notes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T4wjgbVL4HAC5Rdaw75VbV
This commit is contained in:
2026-09-21 07:20:14 +02:00
parent fc90cf9a5f
commit 782415122d
101 changed files with 9542 additions and 3930 deletions
+2 -321
View File
@@ -57,43 +57,6 @@ describe('usePlannedDays', () => {
expect(api.getPlannedDays).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('adds planned day and refreshes', async () => {
const mockAdded = makePlannedLeaveDay({
id: '2',
workspaceId: 'ws1',
childId: 'child1',
parentPersonalDataUuid: 'parent1',
date: '2026-06-16',
dayType: 'vacation',
isDubbeldag: false,
})
vi.mocked(api.createPlannedDay).mockResolvedValue(mockAdded)
vi.mocked(api.getPlannedDays).mockResolvedValue([mockAdded])
renderHook(() => usePlannedDays('child1'))
await act(async () => {
// just test that add can be called; mocks handle the result
})
expect(api.createPlannedDay).not.toHaveBeenCalled() // won't be called without user action
})
it('removes planned day and refreshes', async () => {
vi.mocked(api.deletePlannedDay).mockResolvedValue(undefined)
vi.mocked(api.getPlannedDays).mockResolvedValue([])
const { result } = renderHook(() => usePlannedDays('child1'))
await act(async () => {
await result.current.remove('pd1')
})
expect(api.deletePlannedDay).toHaveBeenCalledWith('pd1')
expect(api.getPlannedDays).toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('handles fetch error and sets error state', async () => {
const errorMessage = 'Network error'
vi.mocked(api.getPlannedDays).mockRejectedValue(new Error(errorMessage))
@@ -122,113 +85,6 @@ describe('usePlannedDays', () => {
expect(result.current.data).toBeNull()
})
it('updates planned day and refreshes', async () => {
const mockUpdated = makePlannedLeaveDay({
id: '1',
workspaceId: 'ws1',
childId: 'child1',
parentPersonalDataUuid: 'parent1',
date: '2026-06-16',
dayType: 'lagsta',
isDubbeldag: false,
})
vi.mocked(api.updatePlannedDay).mockResolvedValue(mockUpdated)
vi.mocked(api.getPlannedDays).mockResolvedValue([mockUpdated])
const { result } = renderHook(() => usePlannedDays('child1'))
await act(async () => {
await result.current.update('1', { day_type: 'lagsta' })
})
expect(api.updatePlannedDay).toHaveBeenCalledWith('1', { day_type: 'lagsta' })
expect(api.getPlannedDays).toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('updates data after successful add', async () => {
const initialData = [
makePlannedLeaveDay({
id: '1',
workspaceId: 'ws1',
childId: 'child1',
parentPersonalDataUuid: 'parent1',
date: '2026-06-15',
dayType: 'vacation',
isDubbeldag: false,
}),
]
const newData = makePlannedLeaveDay({
id: '2',
workspaceId: 'ws1',
childId: 'child1',
parentPersonalDataUuid: 'parent1',
date: '2026-06-16',
dayType: 'vacation',
isDubbeldag: false,
})
vi.mocked(api.getPlannedDays).mockResolvedValueOnce(initialData)
vi.mocked(api.createPlannedDay).mockResolvedValue(newData)
vi.mocked(api.getPlannedDays).mockResolvedValueOnce([...initialData, newData])
const { result } = renderHook(() => usePlannedDays('child1'))
await act(async () => {
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 0))
})
expect(result.current.data).toEqual(initialData)
await act(async () => {
await result.current.add({ workspace_id: 'ws1', child_id: 'child1', date: '2026-06-16', day_type: 'vacation', parent_personal_data_uuid: 'parent1' })
})
expect(result.current.data).toEqual([...initialData, newData])
})
it('updates data after successful remove', async () => {
const initialData = [
makePlannedLeaveDay({
id: '1',
workspaceId: 'ws1',
childId: 'child1',
parentPersonalDataUuid: 'parent1',
date: '2026-06-15',
dayType: 'vacation',
isDubbeldag: false,
}),
makePlannedLeaveDay({
id: '2',
workspaceId: 'ws1',
childId: 'child1',
parentPersonalDataUuid: 'parent1',
date: '2026-06-16',
dayType: 'vacation',
isDubbeldag: false,
}),
]
vi.mocked(api.getPlannedDays).mockResolvedValueOnce(initialData)
vi.mocked(api.deletePlannedDay).mockResolvedValue(undefined)
vi.mocked(api.getPlannedDays).mockResolvedValueOnce([initialData[0]!])
const { result } = renderHook(() => usePlannedDays('child1'))
await act(async () => {
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 0))
})
expect(result.current.data).toEqual(initialData)
await act(async () => {
await result.current.remove('2')
})
expect(result.current.data).toEqual([initialData[0]])
})
it('refreshes data explicitly', async () => {
const mockData = [
makePlannedLeaveDay({
@@ -303,50 +159,6 @@ describe('usePlannedDays', () => {
expect(result.current.error).toBeNull()
})
it('handles add error gracefully', async () => {
vi.mocked(api.getPlannedDays).mockResolvedValue([])
vi.mocked(api.createPlannedDay).mockRejectedValue(new Error('Create failed'))
const { result } = renderHook(() => usePlannedDays('child1'))
await act(async () => {
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 0))
})
let addError: Error | undefined
await act(async () => {
try {
await result.current.add({ workspace_id: 'ws1', child_id: 'child1', date: '2026-06-16', day_type: 'vacation', parent_personal_data_uuid: 'parent1' })
} catch (err) {
addError = err as Error
}
})
expect(addError?.message).toBe('Create failed')
})
it('handles update error gracefully', async () => {
vi.mocked(api.getPlannedDays).mockResolvedValue([])
vi.mocked(api.updatePlannedDay).mockRejectedValue(new Error('Update failed'))
const { result } = renderHook(() => usePlannedDays('child1'))
await act(async () => {
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 0))
})
let updateError: Error | undefined
await act(async () => {
try {
await result.current.update('1', { day_type: 'lagsta' })
} catch (err) {
updateError = err as Error
}
})
expect(updateError?.message).toBe('Update failed')
})
it('discards a stale response for a previous childId (P1 stale-response guard)', async () => {
let resolveFirst: (value: ReturnType<typeof makePlannedLeaveDay>[]) => void = () => {}
let resolveSecond: (value: ReturnType<typeof makePlannedLeaveDay>[]) => void = () => {}
@@ -406,96 +218,8 @@ describe('usePlannedDays', () => {
expect(result.current.data).toEqual(child2Data)
})
it('handles remove error gracefully', async () => {
vi.mocked(api.getPlannedDays).mockResolvedValue([])
vi.mocked(api.deletePlannedDay).mockRejectedValue(new Error('Delete failed'))
const { result } = renderHook(() => usePlannedDays('child1'))
await act(async () => {
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 0))
})
let removeError: Error | undefined
await act(async () => {
try {
await result.current.remove('1')
} catch (err) {
removeError = err as Error
}
})
expect(removeError?.message).toBe('Delete failed')
})
describe('plan-version invalidation', () => {
it('bumps planVersion after a successful add', async () => {
vi.mocked(api.getPlannedDays).mockResolvedValue([])
vi.mocked(api.createPlannedDay).mockResolvedValue(
makePlannedLeaveDay({ id: '1', date: '2026-06-16' }),
)
const { result } = renderHook(() => usePlannedDays('child1'))
await act(async () => {
await result.current.add({
workspace_id: 'ws1',
child_id: 'child1',
date: '2026-06-16',
day_type: 'vacation',
parent_personal_data_uuid: 'parent1',
})
})
expect(bumpPlanVersion).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
})
it('bumps planVersion after a successful update', async () => {
vi.mocked(api.getPlannedDays).mockResolvedValue([])
vi.mocked(api.updatePlannedDay).mockResolvedValue(makePlannedLeaveDay({ id: '1' }))
const { result } = renderHook(() => usePlannedDays('child1'))
await act(async () => {
await result.current.update('1', { day_type: 'lagsta' })
})
expect(bumpPlanVersion).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
})
it('bumps planVersion after a successful remove', async () => {
vi.mocked(api.getPlannedDays).mockResolvedValue([])
vi.mocked(api.deletePlannedDay).mockResolvedValue(undefined)
const { result } = renderHook(() => usePlannedDays('child1'))
await act(async () => {
await result.current.remove('1')
})
expect(bumpPlanVersion).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
})
it('does not bump planVersion when a mutation fails', async () => {
vi.mocked(api.getPlannedDays).mockResolvedValue([])
vi.mocked(api.createPlannedDay).mockRejectedValue(new Error('boom'))
const { result } = renderHook(() => usePlannedDays('child1'))
await act(async () => {
try {
await result.current.add({
workspace_id: 'ws1',
child_id: 'child1',
date: '2026-06-16',
day_type: 'vacation',
parent_personal_data_uuid: 'parent1',
})
} catch {
// expected
}
})
expect(bumpPlanVersion).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('refetches when planVersion changes, even without a local mutation (invalidation from another instance)', async () => {
it('refetches when planVersion changes, even without a local mutation (invalidation from another hook, e.g. useDayAssertions or usePlanSync)', async () => {
vi.mocked(api.getPlannedDays).mockResolvedValue([])
const { rerender } = renderHook(() => usePlannedDays('child1'))
@@ -504,7 +228,7 @@ describe('usePlannedDays', () => {
})
const callCountBefore = vi.mocked(api.getPlannedDays).mock.calls.length
// Simulate another usePlannedDays instance bumping the shared counter.
// Simulate another hook (e.g. useDayAssertions) bumping the shared counter.
vi.mocked(useWorkspace).mockReturnValue(
makeWorkspaceContextValue({ planVersion: 1, bumpPlanVersion }),
)
@@ -516,48 +240,5 @@ describe('usePlannedDays', () => {
expect(vi.mocked(api.getPlannedDays).mock.calls.length).toBeGreaterThan(callCountBefore)
})
it('does not loop: bumping its own planVersion after a mutation causes one extra refetch, not repeated ones', async () => {
vi.mocked(api.getPlannedDays).mockResolvedValue([])
vi.mocked(api.createPlannedDay).mockResolvedValue(
makePlannedLeaveDay({ id: '1', date: '2026-06-16' }),
)
// bumpPlanVersion actually bumps a real counter here (rather than a
// no-op mock) so the effect's dependency genuinely changes once, the
// same way the real WorkspaceProvider would.
let planVersion = 0
vi.mocked(useWorkspace).mockImplementation(() =>
makeWorkspaceContextValue({
planVersion,
bumpPlanVersion: () => {
planVersion += 1
},
}),
)
const { result, rerender } = renderHook(() => usePlannedDays('child1'))
await act(async () => {
await result.current.add({
workspace_id: 'ws1',
child_id: 'child1',
date: '2026-06-16',
day_type: 'vacation',
parent_personal_data_uuid: 'parent1',
})
})
rerender()
await act(async () => {
await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 0))
})
// Own direct fetch() after add, plus one effect-triggered refetch from
// its own bump — not an unbounded/growing number of calls.
const callCountAfterFirstSettle = vi.mocked(api.getPlannedDays).mock.calls.length
rerender()
await act(async () => {
await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 0))
})
expect(vi.mocked(api.getPlannedDays).mock.calls.length).toBe(callCountAfterFirstSettle)
})
})
})