Warnings such as "vacation days at risk of being lost" kept showing after
the planner had already resolved them. The planner itself was firing
correctly -- PlanSyncProvider syncs on every plan-input change -- so the
fault was in the warnings, in two independent places.
The vacation-expiry warning was computed before allocation. It read
`vacation_forfeiting`, which the loader derives from already-committed
usage, while `_assign_tier3` deliberately spends at-risk vacation days
first precisely to avoid that forfeiture. The figure therefore counted
days the plan was in the middle of saving. `_vacation_expiry_warnings`
now subtracts the vacation days this run actually placed for that parent
and year, clamped at zero -- sound because the bank is FIFO, so a day
spent in year Y retires one expiring day one-for-one. The full
carry-forward simulation is still not duplicated inside the ledger.
The Dashboard then never refreshed them. Its proposal came from a
one-shot effect guarded by `proposal === null`, with no planVersion
dependency, so the card kept rendering the pre-replan warning until
remount -- while `syncPlan` was already returning a fresh proposal that
both call sites discarded. PlanSyncProvider now exposes that proposal
behind a monotonic counter, and usePlanProposal prefers it once any sync
has completed, keeping `propose()` for the first load.
Also adds a manual recompute button to Settings, which only bumps
planVersion and reports what the resulting sync did, and fixes partner
add/remove never bumping planVersion at all -- that gap meant gaining or
losing a parent never re-ran the allocator, though it changes who days
can be assigned to. Rename stays cosmetic.
Verified in the browser: a 2031 warning of 15 days dropped to 12 after
three vacation days were planned, without a reload.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014jPFUcCJ5AKXmPVC1anhXe
Three strands of work that grew together across the same settings screen and
API client, so they land as one change.
Per-year preschool planning days ("studiedagar"): new table, repository
(SQLite + Postgres), service, router and migration 007, plus the hooks and
Settings UI to plan and record them per child and year. Allocation now
reserves the recorded figure for a year where one exists and only falls back
to the child-level estimate otherwise, marking that fallback as assumed.
Partner invitations: workspaces issue and list invitations, registration
accepts an invite token to join the inviter's workspace instead of creating a
personal one, and a /join/:token page plus the settings invite panel drive it.
Vacation forfeiture: tips and the dashboard now distinguish days a parent
genuinely loses from days that merely age, so the warning stops firing on
balances that were never at risk.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Taking one day out of a period the planner placed did nothing that
lasted: the period still asked for a full week, so the next sync put the
day straight back. The option was disabled rather than lying about it.
A removed day is now recorded as its own thing — no leave for this
parent, this child, this date — and the planner honours it on every
later sync. It is kept apart from the working-day overrides, which
answer a different question about the calendar rather than about the
plan.
The day belongs to the parent whose band was clicked, so removing one
parent's day leaves their partner's alone; where both parents were to be
off on one funding arrangement, the partner is simply funded on their
own instead. A removed day shortens what the period is asking for rather
than counting as a day the plan failed to find, so the advice about
closing a shortfall does not start arguing for a day nobody wants.
Nothing is removed without a way back: the toast undoes it, and the day
itself is marked in the calendar and offers to restore.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ei7gCZzdd751uZtPzb1Pep
Onboarding asks explicitly for one or two parents and shows one card per
parent for balances; the balance form is per parent with inline
validation; the partner can be filled from the FK deduction or added
from it. Settings and Dashboard reuse the same form.
CSS: bare buttons carry no colour any more; buttons, cards, choice
cards, fields, alerts, badges, eyebrow and modal chrome are defined once
in primitives.css. Media queries live only in responsive.css. A style
guard test blocks hex, !important and stray media queries. Bilingual
fixes: calendar selects size by content, header no longer wraps. Vitest
is capped at four workers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Applying a plan by itself stopped being something the interface does once
every edit began recomputing and saving in one call. The hook that posted
straight to the apply endpoint had no caller left, nor did its request type
or its fixture.
The response decoder stays, since the sync response embeds the same object,
and the two tests being deleted were the only ones checking how its collision
and rejection fields are renamed — that coverage moved onto the sync test
rather than leaving with the code it happened to live next to.
The page opened with generic tiles and a bar reading forty-eight of ninety-six
weeks, which was neither weeks nor connected to the age-four ceiling it appeared
to describe. It is replaced by one headline and a bar per parent, in days,
against each parent's own savable limit as the server reports it.
The headline has two framings on the same arithmetic. Before anything is
planned it says what there is to plan and what will be lost without a plan,
because on the first day almost the whole entitlement is technically at risk
and saying so bluntly reads as an accusation. Once a plan exists it warns about
the days genuinely at stake.
A timeline of the years to the fourth birthday answers what the next four years
look like, which a month-at-a-time calendar cannot. Shortfalls, surplus advice
and balances sit below the fold, read-only: applying is automatic now, so a
second apply button would be a way to get two different answers.
Rejection messages move to one shared place that resolves a parent's name, so
an identifier can no longer surface in their place.
A frozen shared constant forces a test needing one different field to
either mutate shared state, leaking into every other test, or spread it
by hand. The make*(overrides) factories cover both cases and were already
doing the same job, so the constants were redundant.
MOCK_PARENT_A and MOCK_PARENT_B were distinct identities that partner
tests tell apart, so their uuid and name are now passed explicitly at
each call site rather than left to a factory default -- the values those
tests depend on stay visible where they are used.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RXMhc9nT6sNz1SL4j8dznL
ESLint turned `no-explicit-any` off for test files, and 219 casts had
accumulated across 12 of them. Two shapes, very different risks: most
were `(useWorkspace as any).mockReturnValue(...)`, mere laziness that
`vi.mocked()` does properly; the rest cast partial fixtures onto API
types, which erases the contract exactly where a test should enforce it.
That second kind matters here specifically. This project's recurring bug
is a field silently dropped between backend and frontend -- the
hand-written mapping in models/plan.py has done it twice, and apiFetch
mishandling structured errors was the same shape. A test that casts an
incomplete fixture to `any` keeps passing through precisely that change.
A typed fixture layer already existed at tests/fixtures/mockData.ts and
was imported by exactly zero tests: the right tool was there and
invisible, so everyone reached for a cast. It is now a set of
`make*(overrides: Partial<T>) => T` factories returning complete, valid
objects, split by domain with a barrel. When a type gains a field, one
factory fails to compile instead of thirty tests silently passing.
With the count at zero the ESLint exemption is deleted, so this cannot
regrow. Removing it immediately caught two `}: any` prop stubs that a
grep for "as any" had missed; those mocks now use the real components'
exported prop types.
`as unknown as T` survives in five places, each a test deliberately
feeding invalid input (an undefined breakdown, missing tierData, a bogus
leave type). CLAUDE.md now documents that as the only accepted escape,
and points at the factories.
interface PollResponse in useScraperFetch.ts is exported so its shape can
be derived rather than duplicated -- pollScraperSession declares
Promise<unknown>, so there was no other honest way to type it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RXMhc9nT6sNz1SL4j8dznL
jacobh2