Warnings such as "vacation days at risk of being lost" kept showing after the planner had already resolved them. The planner itself was firing correctly -- PlanSyncProvider syncs on every plan-input change -- so the fault was in the warnings, in two independent places. The vacation-expiry warning was computed before allocation. It read `vacation_forfeiting`, which the loader derives from already-committed usage, while `_assign_tier3` deliberately spends at-risk vacation days first precisely to avoid that forfeiture. The figure therefore counted days the plan was in the middle of saving. `_vacation_expiry_warnings` now subtracts the vacation days this run actually placed for that parent and year, clamped at zero -- sound because the bank is FIFO, so a day spent in year Y retires one expiring day one-for-one. The full carry-forward simulation is still not duplicated inside the ledger. The Dashboard then never refreshed them. Its proposal came from a one-shot effect guarded by `proposal === null`, with no planVersion dependency, so the card kept rendering the pre-replan warning until remount -- while `syncPlan` was already returning a fresh proposal that both call sites discarded. PlanSyncProvider now exposes that proposal behind a monotonic counter, and usePlanProposal prefers it once any sync has completed, keeping `propose()` for the first load. Also adds a manual recompute button to Settings, which only bumps planVersion and reports what the resulting sync did, and fixes partner add/remove never bumping planVersion at all -- that gap meant gaining or losing a parent never re-ran the allocator, though it changes who days can be assigned to. Rename stays cosmetic. Verified in the browser: a 2031 warning of 15 days dropped to 12 after three vacation days were planned, without a reload. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014jPFUcCJ5AKXmPVC1anhXe
Föräldraledigplannerare
A planner for Swedish parental leave (föräldraledighet) — solo or with a partner — that folds in vacation days and optimizes leave over time so that as few days as possible are lost at the child's 4th birthday, after which only 96 days may be saved (48 per parent, non-poolable, as soon as the child has two or more parents).
Full-stack monorepo: TypeScript/React/Vite frontend, Python/FastAPI backend,
SQLite by default. Postgres is a partial stub, not a usable swap yet — see
backend/README.md.
Quick start
From frontend/:
npm install
npm run dev # runs uvicorn (:8000) and Vite (:5173) together
Open http://localhost:5173 (not 127.0.0.1 — Vite's dev server binds
IPv6 ::1, so only localhost resolves to it).
The backend can also run on its own, from backend/:
uv sync
uv run uvicorn app.main:app --reload --port 8000
Seed a ready-to-explore demo workspace (couple, a partner, a child, vacation history, leave wishes, a deliberate shortfall) through the normal service/repository layers — no raw SQL:
cd backend
uv run python scripts/seed_demo.py --reset
It prints the demo login (fixed credentials, safe to re-run — without
--reset it's a no-op if the demo user already exists).
The Försäkringskassan scraper (BankID login flow via Playwright) is enabled
by default. Exercise the login UI directly with npm run login from
frontend/; Chromium must be installed separately:
uv run playwright install chromium.
The app
Three tabs:
- Översikt — the headline figure for days at risk at the 4th birthday, per-parent bars against each parent's savable cap, a year-by-year timeline, and shortfall/surplus detail below the fold.
- Kalender — where leave is authored. Drag a range to create a period, click a band to edit it, click a day to change which resource funds it (sjukpenning/lägstanivå/vacation). A season-preset rail helps place common periods (summer, Christmas, Easter). Day overrides (marking a specific date as a working day or a free day, overriding the calendar) live in Inställningar, not on the calendar itself.
- Inställningar.
The calendar is the plan. There's no separate propose-then-apply step:
every edit recomputes and persists immediately, reporting what changed with
an undo. A LeaveWish is a recurring intent (e.g. "summer", "Christmas");
the allocator decides which resource — parental days, vacation, unpaid —
funds each day, without retyping days a user has pinned by hand.
First run walks a wizard: add the child, optionally add a partner (planning solo vs. together is derived from whether a partner has been added — there is no separate solo/couple choice), then set balances — fetch from Försäkringskassan via BankID, enter manually, or skip (figures are then marked as estimates).
Layout
backend/app/
entities/ persistence-layer row shapes
models/ Pydantic v2 API schemas
repositories/ abstract repository interfaces
repositories_impl/ sqlite/ (default, complete) and postgres/ (partial — one entity only)
services/ business logic — planning, tips, analytics, auth
scrapers/ Försäkringskassan scraper (Playwright)
routers/ thin FastAPI route handlers
backend/migrations/ Alembic migrations (hand-written, not ORM-generated)
backend/scripts/ seed_demo.py and other dev-only scripts
frontend/src/
pages/ route-level screens (Dashboard, Calendar, Settings, ...)
components/ presentational + composite components (BEM CSS)
hooks/ data-fetching/state (the data layer — no TanStack Query)
services/ api.ts (HTTP client) + errors.ts
context/ Auth + Workspace React context
frontend/e2e/ Playwright end-to-end specs
Routers call services; services call the repository interfaces — never
repositories_impl directly. Components consume hooks; hooks call
services/api.ts — components never call fetch directly.
Tests & gates
Backend (from backend/):
uv run ruff check .
uv run ruff format --check .
uv run pytest --cov=app --cov-report=term-missing --cov-fail-under=80
Frontend (from frontend/):
npm run typecheck
npm run lint # ESLint, zero warnings allowed
npm run coverage # Vitest, thresholds: lines 96% / functions 91% / branches 92% / statements 96%
Both suites pass comfortably above their gates (backend ~84% vs. an 80%
floor; frontend above 96/91/92/96 — see frontend/vitest.config.ts). Gates
are a regression ratchet, not a target; run the commands above for current
numbers rather than trusting a hardcoded count here, which drifts fast.
CI (.github/workflows/ci.yml) runs all of the above, plus a Playwright E2E
suite that reports but does not yet block merges.
Further reading
CLAUDE.md— conventions, stack details, model-tier rules for contributors.ARCHITECTURE.md/PLANNING_ENGINE_SPEC.md— design and rationale. Both predate parts of the current behavior; sections marked SUPERSEDED note what changed and why.backend/README.md— backend-specific setup and the reference vertical slice to copy when adding a new entity.