Warnings such as "vacation days at risk of being lost" kept showing after
the planner had already resolved them. The planner itself was firing
correctly -- PlanSyncProvider syncs on every plan-input change -- so the
fault was in the warnings, in two independent places.
The vacation-expiry warning was computed before allocation. It read
`vacation_forfeiting`, which the loader derives from already-committed
usage, while `_assign_tier3` deliberately spends at-risk vacation days
first precisely to avoid that forfeiture. The figure therefore counted
days the plan was in the middle of saving. `_vacation_expiry_warnings`
now subtracts the vacation days this run actually placed for that parent
and year, clamped at zero -- sound because the bank is FIFO, so a day
spent in year Y retires one expiring day one-for-one. The full
carry-forward simulation is still not duplicated inside the ledger.
The Dashboard then never refreshed them. Its proposal came from a
one-shot effect guarded by `proposal === null`, with no planVersion
dependency, so the card kept rendering the pre-replan warning until
remount -- while `syncPlan` was already returning a fresh proposal that
both call sites discarded. PlanSyncProvider now exposes that proposal
behind a monotonic counter, and usePlanProposal prefers it once any sync
has completed, keeping `propose()` for the first load.
Also adds a manual recompute button to Settings, which only bumps
planVersion and reports what the resulting sync did, and fixes partner
add/remove never bumping planVersion at all -- that gap meant gaining or
losing a parent never re-ran the allocator, though it changes who days
can be assigned to. Rename stays cosmetic.
Verified in the browser: a 2031 warning of 15 days dropped to 12 after
three vacation days were planned, without a reload.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014jPFUcCJ5AKXmPVC1anhXe
jacobh2
b76fb7417e